+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Just when you think you've heard it all....

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    03-26-2024 @ 07:30 AM
    Location
    On the right side of Australia, below the middle and a little bit in from the edge.
    Posts
    1,239
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:17 PM

    Just when you think you've heard it all....

    I came across a request for detailed drawings for the bolthead of a No4 MkI*. Ok, perhaps not anything unusual there, some collectors are always chasing tech docs of one sort or another.... But, this gent wants to make his own bolthead, and doesn't like the fact that the three boltheads he owns are different sizes. Now, the reason he gives for this is the fact he had a catastrophic failure of a bolthead which resulted in him getting sprayed with burnt powder residue, the shooter beside him being burnt also, and a passing range officer being struck by a piece of the shattered bolt head. Not wanting to allow the thread to deviate into an investigation of the failure, he has said only that he was shooting cast bullets out of handloaded ammunition at the time.... and could find no reason for the failure....

    Anyone else hearing alarm bells here? I suggested he put his trust in the proven track record of the Lee Enfield action and parts, but re-visit what he had done wrong that could have caused the misshap...

    I did say I wasn't aware of any such failure that couldn't be attributed to operator error in some way... have I made a wrong statement here?

    Things that come to my mind from the scant information available so far...
    Was it a DP rifle?
    Was the bore fouled/ blocked?
    Did his handload cause a serious overpressure by
    1) a double charge of a fast burning pistol powder popular for lead pill shooters?
    2) Or a half full case and a flashover of the powder.
    3) Was the projectile sized correct?
    4) Not crimped too tight or even too hard compound?

    Another though just to mind, is the bolt missing the lug which prevents the cocking piece falling when the bolt isn't locked... allowing ignition and the unlocked bolt flying rearward from the pressure- effectively an out of breech ignition?

    ...any discussion welcome here... have I missed something? Or should we all be making our own boltheads so we aren't injured at the range?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to Son For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:29 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    77
    Posts
    963
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:17 AM
    I have been following this saga elsewhere and find it fascininating. The gentleman claims to be a machinist but does not want to reverse engineer the design by measuring parts he has in hand. He seems to think that the orignal drawings are a holy grail that will solve all his problems. He apparently does not know that the the drawing will be in Enfield Inch measurements where a US inch is not the same as the Enfield Inch. Not a problem for the Britishicon as Enfield made their own tools and gauges (which is why the problem existed into the late 1920's). He does not consider how the measured bolt heads can vary so much.

    I wonder if this is all a mechanism to allow him to shift blame away from personal responsibility. Boo Boos and hand loaded ammunition go hand in hand.

  5. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to breakeyp For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #3
    Legacy Member NavyShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-08-2022 @ 04:29 PM
    Location
    Waverley, overlooking the lake
    Age
    50
    Posts
    93
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:17 AM
    Had a similar incident here in Nova Scotia a few years back. I drove the RO to the hospital....remarkably quick service when they hear "Firearms malfunction"....

    In the end, the determination was that it was likely a flashover of a reduced powder charge in the case due to inattention while reloading.

    NS

  8. #4
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:05 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,836
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:17 AM
    The thing you almost always find is you NEVER get all the facts about one of these incidents. It was NEVER his fault. There's always"By the way, one more thing" that doesn't seem to surface. This whole thing is undoubtably his error during reloading. Whether he's aware of it or not. If we had ALL the facts(powder, charge, primers used,squib possibility) we'd be able to point to exactly what the problem was before the catastrophic failure of a proven battle rifle. These guys are always a master reloader.
    Regards, Jim

  9. #5
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 05:50 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:17 AM
    Son - as you'll have seen I also asked him if it was a resurected DP rifle and what load he was using.
    John Sukey asked the same Q's.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  10. #6
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    01-10-2022 @ 02:07 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:17 AM
    I thought that guy's story was an exact repeat of one that appeared on that forum a year or so previously - and which appeared to be some sort of troll attempt? I predict that there will be no photos, no independent account, no clarification of the handloads in use....

  11. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    RJW NZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    10-04-2014 @ 11:58 PM
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    1,241
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:17 AM
    Hmm, out of all the things that could be deemed remotely feasible in the way of a firearms malfunction I would have thought a bolt head to be so well and squarely supported that disintegrating what is almost solid little lump of steel would be darn near impossible. I'm with son, I want to see pictures.

  12. #8
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 04:58 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,163
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:17 PM
    C'mon you lot, this bloke has the right to commit suicide any way he likes, just a pity it will be another firearm related incident.

  13. #9
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:54 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,237
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:17 PM
    Ah, reverse engineering; that's how we did the M-10 bolt and bolthead. The receiver and barrel drawings provided reference surfaces. The trick was to measure a LOT of components to establish a range. We then applied much of the tolerance schedule from the No1 Mk111 bolthead drawing to the No4 data and used that as a starting point before fooling around with the extractor and squeezing in a plunger ejector.

    As long as the machine shop, the heat-treaters and the metrology lads do their part, it all works fine.

    My two bob's worth is that there was something very odd about that rifle that blew up:

    Excessive headspace from bolt and / or receiver wear / mismatch is a good place to start. Fitting a No3 bolthead MAY have closed the gap, but then there was still an ignition issue. So, maybe the rear of the bolthead was "adjusted" to allow greater striker protrusion. This only works up to a point (Boom! Tish!....Tish!....BOOM!!), because, eventually, the "reverse ogive" of the striker will jam solid in the matching bore of the bolthead. Now, were someone to "adjust" the striker or bolthead to allow more clearance, they could achieve greater protrusion: not that this is indeed a good thing.

    Note also that the original boltheads were made from case-hardened mild steel. Early SMLE ones were malleable cast iron and later case-hardened mild steel. The term "nalleable" in relation to cast iron is important. What is also important to note is that the No1 Mk111 boltheads were only case-hardened on the face and the "hook" (the elegant bit that rides along the RHS rail). The rest was left "as forged". No4 boltheads were probably subject to similar treatment. The idea is that the "hard bits" will resist wear whilst the relatively "softer" bulk will absorb and transmit firing stress without catastrophic failure.

    My experience with No4 cocking pieces has been instructive in that they seem to break much more often than No1 types. All the examples I have seen of fractured No4 types have been UK production. I suspect this is because Britainicon was actually being bombed whilst trying to produce war materials. Not only that but modern pyrometers and such were nowhere to be found. "Cherry red" is a bit subjective when you are working in different light colour balance and intensity on a 24 hour cycle.

    ALL carbon steels "age". The classic sign is an increase in crystal size. Hardened ones tend to get harder and more brittle over a century or so. Ditto "hardened malleable iron" viz. older flint and percussion type toys. "Over-cooked" ones go bad a lot faster. It is interesting to note that Brit ordnance specs for the SMLE basically forbade the use of any "alloy" steels without the submission by the contractor of a quantity of specific sample pieces to be tested before use was approved. They also allowed for "re-heat-treatment" ONCE and only under closely specified conditions and only for certain parts.

  14. Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Legacy Member Lithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:26 PM
    Location
    NSW OZ
    Posts
    186
    Real Name
    Peter
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:17 AM
    Hmmm........I've got a shot out 303/22 barrel and a couple of SMLE actions laying around.

    I wonder how a .30 cast pill and a large dose of Trail Boss would go?

    I'm backing the bolt head will remain intact

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. OT - Anyone heard from Mikey?
    By Tired Retired in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-05-2010, 08:21 AM
  2. OT Anyone heard from Harlan?
    By kikokat in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-03-2010, 09:21 AM
  3. Attu, the one most never heard about
    By Rick B in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-16-2010, 10:45 AM
  4. anyone ever heard this statement??
    By Pelago in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-19-2009, 01:53 AM
  5. Has anyone heard anything about WTS/WTB forum
    By Dave in N.C. in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-02-2009, 04:56 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks