+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Opinions, please, on No.5 wood

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member splicenut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    06-30-2020 @ 05:33 AM
    Location
    Shore of the Salish Sea, WA, USA
    Posts
    20
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:34 AM

    Opinions, please, on No.5 wood

    I received my original No. 5 wood (sort of) from SARCO yesterday. A bit of a mixed bag, as the buttstock and butt plate are NOT original. The stock is one of those recently modified No. 4 jobs and the butt plate and pad are reproductions. The forestock and handguard are original, although there is a 1" crack in the front of the handguard. I'll have to call SARCO to get this sorted out on Monday.

    My question is this: How unauthentic would it look to use the dark walnut SARCO front wood with the blonde buttstock that currently resides on my poor, bubba'd No. 5? I wouldn't think that military armorers would be too concerned about color coordinating wood when replacing parts. Still, I haven't seen a glaringly two-tone JC before.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM
    Armourers would try to match wood colour as best we could and we had a big tank of wood stain too. Don't be too concerned about the modified No4 butt because this was not unusual, even during the 60's to get these butts through the usual Ordnance system. Mind you, they were done properly and not bodged by some ham-fisted amateur butcher

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    villiers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    01-08-2017 @ 08:32 AM
    Location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Posts
    1,084
    Real Name
    xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:34 PM
    Can´t see that there´d be much of a difference if the No 4 stock is re-cut into a No. 5. Wouldn´t like to do it myself without the jigs etc. used by a professional. The metal frame for the rubber insert is (as far as I can make out) exactly the same as the original. What is noticeable is when the incorrect butt plate screws are replaced with simple wood screws.The No. 5 butt stocks usually have a very nice grain and gain quite a bit from linseeding and polishing. I had the same problem with different coloured wood and ended up replacing the fore-end to make up a better match.

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM
    I have a funny feeling in the back of my memory banks that for some reason that I can't think of/remember why, that the converted No4 to No5 butts used normal No4 rifle sling swivel wood screws (not the larger butt plate screws) vertically instead of the usual No5 4BA long threaded bolt and headed nut. That was the only difference between the two apart from the patched in former sling loop recess. Apart from that, externally, you couldn't tell the difference

  7. #5
    Legacy Member splicenut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    06-30-2020 @ 05:33 AM
    Location
    Shore of the Salish Sea, WA, USA
    Posts
    20
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:34 AM
    Thread Starter

    Thanks, all

    I got on the phone with SARCO today. They instructed me to send back the replica bits so that they can replace with original. I hope that works out. My current blonde butstock is a bit scuffed, but servicable. No telling how light or dark the walnut front wood will turn out until I give it a good cleaning. Then I can consider staining. Any suggestions for gentle cleaners?

    Two things I didn't mention. First, the forestock has an "Ishy" screw. I guess I'll dust off Peter's article on removing that. Second, The underside of the handguard seems to be coated with some type of black paint. I haven't heard of that before.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member HOOKED ON HISTORY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:47 PM
    Location
    MS/USA
    Posts
    3,991
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by splicenut View Post
    I got on the phone with SARCO today. They instructed me to send back the replica bits so that they can replace with original. I hope that works out. My current blonde butstock is a bit scuffed, but servicable. No telling how light or dark the walnut front wood will turn out until I give it a good cleaning. Then I can consider staining. Any suggestions for gentle cleaners?
    I have used Murphys Oil Soap with good results. Test on an inconspicious area to see how the finish reacts.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. More opinions please
    By Bill Hollinger in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-25-2011, 12:29 PM
  2. Opinions please
    By Bill Hollinger in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-21-2011, 09:45 AM
  3. Low Wood or High Wood
    By Bulls-I_24 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 11:25 PM
  4. Opinions please
    By Bill Hollinger in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-02-2009, 02:08 PM
  5. opinions
    By rice 123 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-28-2009, 10:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks