+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 70

Thread: Which is a more accuraate rifle? The No1 MK 3 or the No 4 MK1

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    JerryB08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    01-19-2014 @ 07:10 AM
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    82
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:23 PM

    Which is a more accuraate rifle? The No1 MK 3 or the No 4 MK1

    Hello all, I am new here and I thought I would ask all the experts their opinion on the two rifles. Many of the changes on the No4 were to make it easier to produce, I personally have always favored the No 1 Mk 3's ( Which I currently own after bringing 53 Lithgowicon back from being hacked into a hunting rifle.) What do you all think and why?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    03-26-2024 @ 07:30 AM
    Location
    On the right side of Australia, below the middle and a little bit in from the edge.
    Posts
    1,239
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    10:23 AM
    I am a die hard No1 man... but you have to appreciate the No4 rifle was an improvement of the rifle design that dated back to the 1890's. A couple of points that have made the No4 rightfully more accurate.. Heavier barrel, aperture sight, longer sight radius, in the MkII, better trigger set up....

    Ok, now having stated the obvious, one of each rifle off the rack these days compared for accuracy might give an entirely different result to what you would expect. I would say the No4 was an easier rifle to learn to shoot, and an easier rifle to become proficient with. At 1000yds, the right rifles in the right hands, there may not be so much between them...

  4. Thank You to Son For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member paulseamus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    07-01-2020 @ 09:08 PM
    Location
    Stratham - South Western Australia
    Posts
    386
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:23 AM
    JerryB08

    History seems to have answered your question.

    During WW2, the Britishicon had stocks of both rifles but chose the No4 for Sniper conversion.

    Post WW2 as the sport of Target Rifle shooting continued to develop, in countries where both rifles were available, the No4 was the main rifle chosen.

    Having said that, any rifle that groups can be deadly accurate in the right set of hands, be it a No1 or a No4

    Paul

  7. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    teal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    05-15-2014 @ 01:33 PM
    Location
    europe
    Posts
    25
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:23 PM
    Attachment 31631Every thing would point to the no4 rifle being more accurate than the SMLE, i think it is all down to what rifle suits best, i have always achieved better scores with my NO1 Mk3 i just prefer it over the no4 it comes to the shoulder so easy it feels nice in the hand and it is very point able i love those rear sights on the SMLE.

  8. #5
    Deceased January 15th, 2016 Beerhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    01-02-2016 @ 04:03 PM
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    1,181
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:23 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by paulseamus View Post
    History seems to have answered your question.

    During WW2, the Britishicon had stocks of both rifles but chose the No4 for Sniper conversion.
    I wonder how much the No.4's slab side had to to with that decision.

  9. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    JerryB08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    01-19-2014 @ 07:10 AM
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    82
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:23 PM
    Thread Starter
    I really am a fan of the No 4. I found it interesting though that Australianicon forces stuck with the number 1 all the way to and through the Korean War. I didn't know that until I got my 53 with the original Butt stock which is stamped 1943. Did they recycle wood when producing the post war ones? I guess I'm assuming its the original as it's coachwood. If anyone can tell me how that can be I would love to know. The advantage of the sights there's no question goes to the No 4. I myself was lucky enough to land a MUES no1 improved sight which would negate that advantage if I could shoot as well as the rifle is capable of. Which I can't. lol..

    The being able to teach recruits to shoot easier in my mind would have very important.

  10. #7
    Legacy Member Maxwell Smart's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    03-03-2024 @ 07:37 AM
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    411
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:23 PM
    Australianicon Forces didn't have a lot of choice - Lithgow wasn't tooled up to make the No 4.

  11. #8
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 07:30 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,406
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:23 PM
    The No.4 was easier to set up for accurate shooting, and more likely to stay put once done. No.1s can 'go off' at unpredictable intervals.

  12. #9
    Legacy Member Paul S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-08-2020 @ 06:58 PM
    Location
    Back and forth between Sydney and Southern California
    Posts
    1,594
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:23 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxwell Smart View Post
    ...Lithgow wasn't tooled up to make the No 4.
    One wonders that while Canadaicon chose to re-tool, that H.M. Australianicon Government chose not to re-tool for a reason. Could it have been that Australia was faced with a harsher strategic situation and the consequent reality of a greater logistic need?

    Afterall, we know that there was every expectation in Canberra that the war with Japanicon would last at least until 1948 --- that is until Hiroshima and Nagasaki compelled Hirohito to consider other options.

  13. #10
    Legacy Member Maxwell Smart's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    03-03-2024 @ 07:37 AM
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    411
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:23 PM
    Canadaicon more or less set up for No 4 rifle production with a "green-field" site; they had no pre-existing SMLE works in place - fairly simple to go straight for the new factory for the new rifle.

    I suspect that there was very little cash about in the Commonwealth coffers at the time to effect the changeover, and in any case the strategic picture, at least at the time that the No 4 factories overseas were being set up, was that the defence of Australiaicon would rest on "Fortress Singapore".

    Once the futility of that notion became apparent, then it was too late to change over. The Lithgow factory was just going to have to churn out SMLEs as quickly as it could.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. United States Rifle M1917 Enfield 300 yards Iron Sights (Rifle Channel Video)
    By Badger in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-21-2011, 02:04 PM
  2. United States Rifle M1917 Enfield 300 yards (Rifle Channel Video)
    By Badger in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-15-2011, 06:35 PM
  3. United States Rifle M1917 Enfield 400 yards (Rifle Channel Video)
    By Badger in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-15-2011, 06:35 PM
  4. United States Rifle M1917 Enfield ETR Knockdown (Rifle Channel Video)
    By Badger in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-15-2011, 06:34 PM
  5. Working The Rossi Gallery Rifle, from American Gunsmith's Book of the Rifle
    By Newsfeed Hound in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-10-2010, 04:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks