Is it correct to say that A3 stocks were "supposed" to be quarter sawn wood and that quarter sawn generally has straight grain lines.
I know I should get a camera... but I'm looking at my stock and it has some "catherdraling" in the buttstock, which I take to be an artifact of plain sawing, but am not 100% certain?
I've seen some critique of Boyd Stocks that they are plain sawn and thus have inauthentic grain with regards to restorations. Any truth to that?