+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Possible manufacturer of Canadian No.4 (T) cheekpieces

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel
    Warren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    03-23-2024 @ 12:55 PM
    Posts
    1,192
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:36 AM

    Possible manufacturer of Canadian No.4 (T) cheekpieces

    No.4Mk.1* (T) cheekpieces..

    I received a small box of odds and ends from the storage sheds of Hill Clark Francis, New Liskeard, Ontario, CANADA a few years ago. The box was an accumulation of odds and ends and consisted mainly of odd bits of wood, some rusty hardware and two No.4 (T) cheekpieces: one finished and one unfinished. Both are unmarked and were in the condition that wood can be after sitting for 50 years in an unheated shed.. The pair were mouldy, weather-beaten and the unfinished cheekpiece was obviously a cull due to two major defects in the wood.

    No markings could distinguished in either cheekpiece, but the interesting fact is that they both appear to be made by a company that has no record of making wood or furniture for the Lee Enfield Rifleicon. It is known that Hill Clark Francis (HCF) made crates for the No.4 sniper, Bren, the Browning machine gun (all types) and the No.7 rifle.

    HCF is found on the end of the bottom wood on the No.4(T) and also on the No.7 (.22) rifle as well as Canadianicon Bren chests.

    I've attached a couple of photo's of the pieces with (Left to right) no.1 is the finished, albeit dirty and mouldy cheekpiece, no.2 is the unfinished cheekpiece with the defects and no.3 being a new, unused Canadian marked cheekpiece. A Britishicon manufactured cheekpiece (no.4) is included for comparison.

    The unused Canadian cheekpiece (no.3) has what appears to be a tiny C-broad arrow and another marking that looks like a wood proof found on the wrist of the butt stock, but I am unable to see it clearly to determine if there is a number as normally found on Canadian wood acceptance markings.

    It appears that some manufacturing tool marks are common to all three of the Canadian cheekpieces.

    While it appears that HCF possibly did make the cheekpieces, this is just a guess on my part, as I have been unable to find any official records or contract listings.
    I am not able to determine what the wood is with my limited knowledge of wood.

    Another puzzle in the Lee Enfield sniper saga.

    Cheers,
    Warren
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Badger; 12-15-2010 at 06:54 AM. Reason: Edited for poster to fix carriage returns ...

  2. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to Warren For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    Legacy Member MJ1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last On
    02-05-2024 @ 03:28 PM
    Location
    Guanacaste
    Posts
    735
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:36 AM
    I think a point has been missed on these items as the end user could and did shape and contour these rests to custom fit them. I see an original rifle with a tall rest with sharp contours that havent been blended It says replacement and thats OK. Rifles never issued out like some of the Savage units will have original rests in full contoure. My original sets have all been shapped and blended. I also have several of Dr. Payneicon's from the 90's waiting to be fit to me.

    Really nice find and good photos Thanks for the post.

    ..MJ..
    MJ, don't take this personally, but that's crap.
    muffett.2008

  5. Thank You to MJ1 For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #3
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    12:36 PM
    Further to what Wheaty says, the original 'as issued' cheek pieces never fitted the contour of the No4 rifle butts because they were originally configured to the shape of, drawn up for and made for the Patt 14 T sniper which isn't the same contour as a No4 butt. It was only coincidence that they fitted the No4T butt, were fitted to it during the later trial period by the small arms school at Hythe (Bisley after June 1940) and thereafter became the norm aross the board. The rest as they say, is history

    There, another useless bit of Lee Enfield history for you

  8. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  9. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    10:36 AM

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by wheaty View Post
    No.4Mk.1* (T) cheekpieces..

    I received a small box of odds and ends from the storage sheds of Hill Clark Francis, New Liskeard, Ontario, CANADA a few years ago. The box was an accumulation of odds and ends and consisted mainly of odd bits of wood, some rusty hardware and two No.4 (T) cheekpieces: one finished and one unfinished. Both are unmarked and were in the condition that wood can be after sitting for 50 years in an unheated shed.. The pair were mouldy, weather-beaten and the unfinished cheekpiece was obviously a cull due to two major defects in the wood.

    No markings could distinguished in either cheekpiece, but the interesting fact is that they both appear to be made by a company that has no record of making wood or furniture for the Lee Enfield Rifleicon. It is known that Hill Clark Francis (HCF) made crates for the No.4 sniper, Bren, the Browning machine gun (all types) and the No.7 rifle.

    HCF is found on the end of the bottom wood on the No.4(T) and also on the No.7 (.22) rifle as well as Canadianicon Bren chests.

    I've attached a couple of photo's of the pieces with (Left to right) no.1 is the finished, albeit dirty and mouldy cheekpiece, no.2 is the unfinished cheekpiece with the defects and no.3 being a new, unused Canadian marked cheekpiece. A Britishicon manufactured cheekpiece (no.4) is included for comparison.

    The unused Canadian cheekpiece (no.3) has what appears to be a tiny C-broad arrow and another marking that looks like a wood proof found on the wrist of the butt stock, but I am unable to see it clearly to determine if there is a number as normally found on Canadian wood acceptance markings.

    It appears that some manufacturing tool marks are common to all three of the Canadian cheekpieces.

    While it appears that HCF possibly did make the cheekpieces, this is just a guess on my part, as I have been unable to find any official records or contract listings.
    I am not able to determine what the wood is with my limited knowledge of wood.

    Another puzzle in the Lee Enfield sniper saga.

    Cheers,
    Warren
    Warren,
    I'd be interested to know if you or any of the other forummers have seen Long Branch 4T's (that haven't been refurbished) with anything other than walnut cheekpieces (something you don't tend to see on UK mfr rifles)? Obviously due to scarcity most of us will not have seen lots of Canadian T's, but of the ones I have seen I have noted three distinct variations of cheekpiece. On one or two early (1943) rifles I have noted examples that are very similar, though not identical to the UK type (which in itself shows several minor variations). On 44 & 45 dated rifles I have seen two other distinct variations, one of which is shown in your photographs as example number 3. The last type I've seen is rather broader in the beam & meatier. I'll try & get some pictures as I can. I'm not doubting you, but is the first example definitely Canadian? It looks to have rather more in common with example No4 than No3. It also does not look to be walnut, although they may exist in other woods, or perhaps it is walnut, but rather weathered.

    Would be glad to get comments from other observers!

    ATB

  10. #5
    Advisory Panel Terry Hawker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:32 PM
    Location
    Agoura CA
    Age
    76
    Posts
    101
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:36 AM

    Cheeky T's

    Roger,

    For what it's worth and to get the ball rolling, here is one example.

    My unissued, 1945, Longbranch No. 4 Mk I* (T), 90L8086, scope 69-C, also has a walnut cheekpiece, and, as you mention, appears more like Warren's example No. 3. It differs in that the contours are all nice and sharp and the location of the deeply counter-sunk screw holes lines up almost top dead center on the cheekpiece, (directly below the point of the front contour), and top of the butt.

    On a different point, out of my three BSA'a and one Enfield ex-Trials 4 T, only the 1944 BSA has an oak cheekpiece. As this is obviously too small a sample to deduce anything, I was wondering if you have any idea how commonly used oak cheekpieces were?

    Thanks,

    Terry

  11. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Terry Hawker For This Useful Post:


  12. #6
    Legacy Member limpetmine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 02:31 PM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    979
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    05:36 AM

    1943 lb (t)

    Here are a few pictures of mine, a walnut butt and cheek piece. A 1943 (T), matching REL scope to butt. My M47 was buried to deep to get to quickly.
    Like Terry, mine has the screw holes directly in the top of the butt, and it similar to #3 of Warrens samples. The grooves/filets on the leading edge are similar as well.
    limpetmine
    Last edited by limpetmine; 12-16-2010 at 12:12 AM.

  13. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to limpetmine For This Useful Post:


  14. #7
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    10:36 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry Hawker View Post
    Roger,

    For what it's worth and to get the ball rolling, here is one example.

    My unissued, 1945, Longbranch No. 4 Mk I* (T), 90L8086, scope 69-C, also has a walnut cheekpiece, and, as you mention, appears more like Warren's example No. 3. It differs in that the contours are all nice and sharp and the location of the deeply counter-sunk screw holes lines up almost top dead center on the cheekpiece, (directly below the point of the front contour), and top of the butt.

    On a different point, out of my three BSA'a and one Enfield ex-Trials 4 T, only the 1944 BSA has an oak cheekpiece. As this is obviously too small a sample to deduce anything, I was wondering if you have any idea how commonly used oak cheekpieces were?

    Thanks,

    Terry
    Terry,
    Thanks for yours. On the note of UKicon mfr T's I was always under the impression that the cheekpieces that appear to be oak, are so, although I remember talking to Tony Hallam (of the now defunct Charnwood Ordnance) that he believed them to be ash. I'm notoriously hopeless on woods & I'd be glad to see what others think. I've spent much time comparing pieces of both oak & ash & find them almost indistinguisgable! Certainly the oak/ash 'pieces seem to predominate on 44 T's & beech on most others, although I have seen a sprinkling of them in what appears to be stained birch (similar to Savage wood), particularly on earlier conversions. However, my observations are purely anecdotal, from the T's & L42's I've seen/handled/owned.

    ATB

  15. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  16. #8
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    12:36 PM
    I don't believe that they were oak either. It was Beech, Birch and if I had to go out of the box a bit, I'd say ash - at a push. Oak rots steel screws like they're going out of fashion, hence the reason why Armourers use it only for the wooden plugs and a patch, if it wasn't subject to a steel screw. Ash doesn't like the wet but beech and birch seem to thrive everywhere.......

  17. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  18. #9
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    10:36 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    I don't believe that they were oak either. It was Beech, Birch and if I had to go out of the box a bit, I'd say ash - at a push. Oak rots steel screws like they're going out of fashion, hence the reason why Armourers use it only for the wooden plugs and a patch, if it wasn't subject to a steel screw. Ash doesn't like the wet but beech and birch seem to thrive everywhere.......
    DPL,
    You have said exactly what Tony Hallam did re the damaging effects of oak on steel screws! Many (?most?) 44 BSA's that I've seen though, have had ash cheekpieces, but most of those of earlier & later mfr seem to be beech. Beech certainly seem to be the most commonly encountered over all. I presume the manufacturer(s) just used whatever wood (of those deemed suitable) was available at the time.....

    ATB

  19. #10
    Advisory Panel Terry Hawker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:32 PM
    Location
    Agoura CA
    Age
    76
    Posts
    101
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:36 AM
    Gents,

    Well, from what Peter tells us, mine certainly can't be oak, as the screws exhibit no sign of rusting. Having made a lot of oak furniture in my time, the identical grain pattern in the cheekpiece on mine led me to make the erroneous conclusion. I'm not going to saw into it to see if it releases the typical dog poo aroma that oak usually disseminates when cut , and it certainly doesn't have the blah grain pattern of beech, so I'm thinking the next runner-up would be ash, then perhaps birch.

    Cheers,

    Terry

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Frog manufacturer help?
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-14-2010, 07:27 PM
  2. Manufacturer of this No 32 Mk I scope?
    By RobD in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-24-2010, 02:53 PM
  3. JC Higgins Mod. 103229 manufacturer???
    By CapnJohn in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-30-2009, 12:38 PM
  4. Magazine manufacturer?
    By Garandrew in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 07:31 PM
  5. Identify manufacturer of No4Mk1* bolt?
    By Six Star in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-30-2007, 08:11 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks