+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: 1907 Bayonet Grips - Repair or replace?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:04 AM

    1907 Bayonet Grips - Repair or replace?

    One of the more difficult issues surrounding the restoration of any item is deciding, when a part needs attention, whether to repair or replace. I purchased a 1907 bayonet by Chapman at a militaria fair last year and, slightly embarrassingly, I didn't notice that someone had ground a slice out of the side of the cross guard, taking a little wood off one grip in the process. The reason why anyone would consider it necessary to grind the side of the cross guard is a complete mystery. I have built up the missing metal with weld, very carefully placed in the required place on the cross guard and then dressed back to size.

    The dilemma which I have are the wood grips which, on one side, are damaged by the grinding of the cross guard and on the other, around the screw/nut counter bores. I have a pair of new old stock grips which I could use as replacements or I could try to tidy up the originals by taking a slither off the surface and then light sanding. With these grips I don't believe that I can remove all the damage by reducing the thickness because it will likely make them too thin.

    I am open to suggestions and thoughts from members on whether it's better to replace the grips but lose the Patina/history or retain the originals, trying to make them look as best as possible, but having to put up with the obvious damage? I don't think that there is a right or a wrong answer here but I would appreciate a reason for answering in a particular way, please.

    Thank-you for any advice.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 11:01 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,734
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:04 PM
    My 1916 Chapman has pretty munted grips I too have spares and to put them on it would detract from its history and really make it look like I dunno a tarted up POS. But thats just me F10 its your bayonet.

  4. Thank You to CINDERS For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Contributing Member Doco overboard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:48 PM
    Location
    Delmarva Peninsula
    Posts
    452
    Real Name
    Brian Stiles
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:04 AM
    Before I change anything I would consider how I would maintain the current grips with the piece. If they were going to be permanently separated and then lost to the bayonet I would leave them with it. However, not being a well versed student of the particular type of bayonet it does appear to me that the original grips may already be a replacement or already altered because of the lack of milling marks to the grips. You have mentioned a weld to the cross guard and if the subsequent repair requires additional work to blend the repair or a significant radical change to the entire appearance occurs I would use the new grip scales. Only you can decide, but if it were my project I would maintain the current grips and use the NOS replacements only in the case of significant damage or to replace a part that is not entirely serviceable.

  7. Thank You to Doco overboard For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:04 AM
    I think that you've effectively answered your own question. You've fixed the bayonet. Why? - because it was was butchered and now it's fixed. Or it WILL be when you get it correctly blackened again. So what on earth would possess you to leave a set of old manky grips on it? So fix the grips too! Don't even bother using those modern repops. Just go out and find yourself a bit of old gnarled walnut and carefully make yourself another set that fit and slightly overlap the edges.

    I'm of the old-time real Armourers school where what comes in the place only goes out perfect. Just like that bayonet would. It has absolutely no historical significance whatsoever, rare and valuable like that, it ain't - and those tatty old grips should be in the bin.

    I hope others offer other opinions.

  9. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  10. #5
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:05 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,836
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Flying10uk View Post
    I didn't notice that someone had ground a slice out of the side of the cross guard, taking a little wood off one grip in the process. The reason why anyone would consider it necessary to grind the side of the cross guard is a complete mystery.
    Perhaps they were grinding off one of those filthy hooked quillions...
    Regards, Jim

  11. #6
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:04 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks Jim. That's the weird thing Jim, I should have really photographed the damage, the grinding was on the side of the cross guard. The worst of the damage was in-line with the damage that can be seen on the bottom grip on the right hand side, picture 1, post 1, where the grip is angled off. I can't work out how anyone could accidentally grind this or what reason there would be for deliberately doing so. I am pleased with the repaired cross guard which I have completed and re-blued this evening. I will post pictures later of this bayonet which has a blade in excellent condition.

    Peter, why do yo say those grips are modern repros? I'm not suggesting that you are wrong but I was wondering how you could tell. I wondered why they weren't a great fit on the bayonet when I tried them for size this afternoon.
    Last edited by Flying10uk; 01-08-2017 at 06:32 PM.

  12. #7
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 11:01 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,734
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:04 PM
    I can understand a car enthusiast wanting their vintage car to gleam like a 1000 suns and blind everyone including themselves as that is their passion besides who wants to ride around in a rust bucket that may be unsafe so we will chop the rust paint it up just like it left the factory that is fair enough my dad was the same when restoring cars for resale.

    I feel the collectible military stuff should be left as it is preserving its history.

  13. #8
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:05 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,836
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Flying10uk View Post
    the grinding was on the side of the cross guard.
    It's impossible to assess exactly what someone along the way had in mind when he was working on it. Hard to say what was happening.
    Regards, Jim

  14. #9
    Legacy Member tankhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last On
    06-28-2023 @ 05:15 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,054
    Real Name
    Mike
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:04 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    I'm of the old-time real Armourers school where what comes in the place only goes out perfect. Just like that bayonet would. It has absolutely no historical significance whatsoever, rare and valuable like that, it ain't - and those tatty old grips should be in the bin.

    I hope others offer other opinions.
    Pete, I like you. Would do exactly the same thing. I guess it is the ingrained training to just get on with a job that needs doing! Civilian Collector mentality is different to our way of thinking! I am not for one minute suggesting what they wold do is wrong at all. It's just not 'our' Way! Lol

    There are many grips out on the collector circuits in the UKicon available. From many varied dealers. They are nearly all ex Australianicon war reserve stocks that were released when the rifles were. many years back now. You can easily spot these as they have the word 'Slazenger' stamped into the grip scales.
    This is easily steamed out & rubbed down to make good. Not forgetting, that each pair of grips will in nearly all cases. NOT fit straight on the bayonet. But WILL require 'fitting'. In my opinion, this particular bayonet was so damaged as to become uninteresting to collectors as it was. Correctly profiled & restored, it now is more aesthetically pleasing to look at. AND has a higher value upon resale...Just my thoughts on this one.

    having mused on this, but this particular Bayonet MAY have had the 'grinding' effected. To clear/ fit over 'something' when hung on a wall?
    Last edited by tankhunter; 01-09-2017 at 03:51 AM.

  15. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to tankhunter For This Useful Post:


  16. #10
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:04 AM
    Thread Starter

    Option 3

    I only thought of this option (3) today and that is to utilise some good 1907 grips currently, but incorrectly, fitted to a M1917 bayonet. I have been intending to either find some correct grips or make some with the double slots in the centre for this M1917 bayonet in any case. So it may be better to use what's on the M1917 on my 1907 bayonet and make or source the replacements for the M1917 because that needs them anyway. The 1907 would have good but Patinated grips.

    Here are some pictures of the M1917 grips.

    Any constructive thoughts appreciated, please.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. P17 Bayonet without grooved grips.
    By Flying10uk in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 08-11-2016, 01:57 PM
  2. When was the end of the P-1907 bayonet
    By Cottage Hill Bill in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 03-29-2016, 05:54 AM
  3. Just got another No.7 Mk1/L Bayonet with red grips marked ENGLAND
    By Douglas Kerley in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-05-2012, 05:06 AM
  4. No.7Mk1/L Bayonet with Black Grips?
    By Douglas Kerley in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-30-2011, 11:11 AM
  5. Repair/Replace?
    By armabill in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-19-2010, 05:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks