+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: M1 Garand accuracy help

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Twinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-05-2013 @ 09:45 AM
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    03:52 PM

    M1 Garand accuracy help

    I have an M1icon Garand that had walking groups due to the stock touching the barrel on the left side near the chamber. I relieved that and no more walking groups but I still have a few flyers. My next area of concern is the rear hand guard to stock fit. With the rifle assembled and the trigger guard locked into position, I can slide a piece of paper between the rear handguard bottom and the stock top (where they meet just in front of the clip latch). But I can't slip the paper between the rear handguard and the stock on the right up toward the stock ferrule. My question is, should I relieve some wood from the front area of the rear handguard where is is contacting the stock so I can slide the paper between the two pieces?

    As of now I have the rear handguard floated on the barrel from the retaining clip to the middle band.

    I have the rear of the hand guard relieved front the front face of the receiver.

    I have the front hand guard relieved from the gas cylinder.

    I have the stock floating from the barrel.

    So the only palce the barrel contacts anything is at the middle band and front handguard ferrule.

    With the pressure of the rear handguard on the stock, I figured that might be affecting something. What do you gentalman think? Thank you, James.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Twinson; 06-28-2009 at 04:33 PM.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    geberl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-29-2009 @ 12:10 PM
    Posts
    30
    Local Date
    04-17-2024
    Local Time
    06:52 AM
    I set mine up so the rear handguard only touches two things, the lower band and the clip. I relieve the underneath except where the clip is located, don't allow it to touch the stock or the reciever. Same with the front handguard, no contact with the op rod, barrel, or gas cylinder. Stock ferrule should only contact the stock and lower band, no contact with the op rod. Barrel floats in the stock and handguards basically from end to end, the op rod should lightly engage the stock on the right to buffer itself, no where else and neither handguard. That's how my wood is configured and it has worked well for me, if I'm still having trouble with a rifle I'd already set up then I go to the gas system, re check the tilt test and if that didn't help then I'd start gauging everything. Most accuracy problems I've had with a decent barrel and tight lock up, have come from wood not fitting as above, gas system, or op rod, sure a loose rear sight will cause problems but have never had one work loose.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Gus Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    43
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    04:52 PM
    I'd also check for any rubs in the inside of the stock after firing.

  6. #4
    Legacy Member Rick H.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    09-15-2020 @ 09:40 AM
    Location
    Muskego, Wisconsin
    Posts
    90
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    04:52 PM

    M1 Op Rod Clearence

    Hello: I was under the impression that you don't want the op rod to touch the stock at all, however if I read correctly, you DO want the op rod to contact the inner stock on the right side to buffer the rod during operation....is this correct??? Rick

  7. #5
    Legacy Member DaveHH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-18-2024 @ 01:37 PM
    Location
    Northern Calif
    Posts
    1,348
    Real Name
    David Haynes
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    04:52 PM

    The NM books say that the upper handguard must have front to rear clearance

    It can move back and forth slightly. It is OK for them to rattle in their respective place. I did this to my good M1icon and it shot 100 yd groups 5 shots inside a 25 cent piece, and many times. If that top (rear) handguard is too tight the barrel has no where to go when it heats and wants to rise a bit.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Griff Murphey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-28-2020 @ 12:07 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    282
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    04:52 PM
    RE a similar post just below, someone recounted my difficulties at the Texas State Hi Power Matches in 2007. I was all over the place at 200 and 300. In desperation I decided to CLEAN the rifle before 600. While using the cleaning rod I contacted the front sight, which moved back and forth easily 1/8" left to right. It had shot loose in the last stages of practice before the match but I had thought, "It is just me..." The next thing was to find an Allen wrench that fit it; very difficult; mine had disappeared from my kit, praise be to an MD from Houston who had a full set of the things. At 600 I shot something like a 93 and an 88, nothing fabulous but a heckuva lot better than I HAD been doing. CHECK THAT FRONT SIGHT!
    Last edited by Griff Murphey; 11-08-2009 at 10:15 AM. Reason: mis-spelling

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Winchester 52D Accuracy
    By RickM in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-26-2009, 09:12 PM
  2. Model 1917 - Poor Accuracy
    By NMC_EXP in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 08:56 PM
  3. mini 14 accuracy ?
    By 11e40 in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-10-2009, 06:53 PM
  4. No. 5 versus No. 4 - relative accuracy
    By Patrick Chadwick in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-10-2009, 09:06 AM
  5. Jungle Carbine Accuracy
    By kent9497 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-29-2008, 08:29 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts