+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 63

Thread: Milsurp Target Competition and Shoot (2012)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #41
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 08:12 AM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    1,193
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    03:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Both nice rifles JM, and both on my wish list but the only way we can have a Garrand is if its a straight pull (no semi auto) and needs cocking every time, as for the M1922 been looking for one for sometime.
    On the Subject of the M1922 and one of my previous posts will start the .22 comp (25 mtr/yrd) at the start of next year and run it the same as the 100 mtr/yard.

    Last edited by bigduke6; 08-24-2012 at 06:54 AM.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    Expert gunsmithing, marksmanship training and equipment for Police, Military and Security personnel as well as for competition marksmen and hunters. William J. Ricca Surplus Sales - Dealer in U.S. parts and accessories Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Chuck in Denver ... Buy-Sell-Trade .. Guns, Cars Motorcycles Service Publications - Collectors books that earn their place in your library! Quartermaster Stores Classifieds - Click HERE to Buy & Sell Banner AD Space Available - Click HERE to Inquire Milsurps Talk Radio (Click to Listen) … Collector talk, military music & more …..
     

  3. #42
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 05:15 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    5,845
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by bigduke6 View Post
    the only way we can have a Garrand is if its a straight pull (no semi auto) and needs cocking every time
    So that would sort of put it in the "modified" class automatically? Or do we take pity on the poor things? I don't think it would help accuracy much if at all.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #43
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 09:59 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,843
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    04:24 PM
    Semi-autos are surely dimensioned so that the bullet has alread exited the muzzle when the gas piston gets going, so the vibration caused by the reloading action cannot affect accuracy (can it?). If the same rifle seems to be less accurate when operating as a semi-auto, my observation at the .30M1 carbine competition on Saturday was that the shooters tend to get into a slighty hectic rhythm, quite simply not taking the same care as they would with a single-shot or repeating rifle.

    So I would allow it.

  6. #44
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 08:12 AM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    1,193
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    03:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Never give it much thought regarding which class, I think it has to go in the modified one.
    To be honest the only straight pulls we tend to get are the AR15 variants, there is now the L1A1 which is on the market, and I have seen a M14 but this was several years ago, there is someone in the UKicon now making the M1icon carbine as a straight pull, and there were a few made a few years ago.

    I sold my AR15 (based on the M4) few years back great rifle but always had probs feeding or extracting and the bolt locking up, very fussy on the ammo etc, looked the part but on the range a real pain at times, guess in semi auto it would of done well, but I,d had enough at the end of the day, and sold it, cant complain as I bought more Enfields with cash from the sale.

    I am looking at one of the L1A1,s that are being assembled here as straight pulls, but I,m looking at a different calibre than .308, I,ll go into that a bit more at a later date......

  7. #45
    Senior Member fn111557's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    Today @ 06:12 AM
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    154
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    Visit fn111557's Youtube Channel
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chadwick View Post
    Semi-autos are surely dimensioned so that the bullet has alread exited the muzzle when the gas piston gets going, so the vibration caused by the reloading action cannot affect accuracy (can it?). If the same rifle seems to be less accurate when operating as a semi-auto, my observation at the .30M1 carbine competition on Saturday was that the shooters tend to get into a slighty hectic rhythm, quite simply not taking the same care as they would with a single-shot or repeating rifle.

    So I would allow it.
    Not quite a scientific experiment but, I have a Yugoslavian SKS. I have tried 5 shot groups in standard semi-auto mode, and change over the gas selector for 5 shot groups in single shot mode, several times. I have let my friends try this also, and without exception, ALL single shot groups were ALWAYS tighter than when shot in semi-auto mode. Just my $.02

  8. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to fn111557 For This Useful Post:


  9. #46
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 05:15 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    5,845
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by fn111557 View Post
    Not quite a scientific experiment but, I have a Yugoslavian SKS. I have tried 5 shot groups in standard semi-auto mode, and change over the gas selector for 5 shot groups in single shot mode, several times. I have let my friends try this also, and without exception, ALL single shot groups were ALWAYS tighter than when shot in semi-auto mode. Just my $.02
    M14s don't have an accuracy change, generally, when shutting the gas off, but the POI does shift. Garands? Due to the gas port location, I can't see it being of much importance. Other than that, I don't have much opinion, except if it gets folks to contribute, then by all means, be accomodating. It's not like we're contesting a big trophy or cash prize!

  10. Thank You to jmoore For This Useful Post:


  11. #47
    Senior Member JohnMOhio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-02-2013 @ 11:05 PM
    Location
    Cleveland Ohio
    Posts
    136
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    I read that you guys were looking for a 50 yard small bore target to use. I thought that you might be able to use this one. Can increase the size to 100% and then print it off.

    I saved the one you folks have for printing to shoot the milsurps competition but not sure if the size is correct. Not familiar with those diameters in mm. I am printing them off on an starndard 8 1/2 X 11 sheet of paper. Once I get to the range, I will submit mine and hope they are the correct size. Will just scan them into my computer.

    Best Regards,
    JohnMOhio
    Attached Files

  12. Thank You to JohnMOhio For This Useful Post:


  13. #48
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 05:15 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    5,845
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMOhio View Post
    I saved the one you folks have for printing to shoot the milsurps competition but not sure if the size is correct.
    I print them from bigduke6's link. My printer actually makes tham about 90-95 percent of full scale, but since I'm shooting at 100 yards rather than 100 meters it isn't a worry.

  14. #49
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 08:12 AM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    1,193
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    03:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by jmoore View Post
    It's not like we're contesting a big trophy or cash prize!
    Thats the whole idea JM, But I may knock something up in the future.....

  15. #50
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 09:59 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,843
    Local Date
    05-24-2013
    Local Time
    04:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by jmoore View Post
    My printer actually makes tham about 90-95 percent of full scale, but since I'm shooting at 100 yards rather than 100 meters it isn't a worry.

    So all you have to do now is to size down the bullets to 90% of their original diameter, and you have kept the same proportions - right?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Milsurp Target Competition and Shoot (2011)
    By bigduke6 in forum Range Reports - Show us how good you are!
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: 01-09-2012, 02:39 PM
  2. Milsurp World Wide target comp
    By bigduke6 in forum M1917 and Pattern 1913/1914 Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-06-2011, 02:26 PM
  3. Milsurp World Wide target comp
    By bigduke6 in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-06-2011, 02:23 PM
  4. Milsurp/Tac Rifle Shoot,July 7th Peace River, AB.
    By Stevo in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-03-2007, 01:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts