+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Please tell me about the cross bolts/lugs on 1903 A3

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    bushmaster1313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last On
    11-16-2016 @ 10:32 PM
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:13 PM

    Please tell me about the cross bolts/lugs on 1903 A3

    Local gunshot is selling a Remington 1903 A3 with a very smooth action.

    But instead of cross bot heads that look like this picture



    there are what look like nails without the flat head (this image from internet)

    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:16 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,838
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 PM
    Those are pins, threaded rods that are screwed in and cleaned off...late stuff. Very nice though.
    Regards, Jim

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel
    Rick the Librarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    04-09-2023 @ 08:59 PM
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Age
    74
    Posts
    2,301
    Real Name
    Rick Slater
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 PM
    Pins were used on late Remington M1903 and early M1903A3s from about late 1942 to mid-1943, in an attempt to save time, materials and labor. It was discovered that the stock with pins didn't hold up to hard use as well as stock bolts and they were restored to production about mid-1943.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    --George Orwell

  6. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Rick the Librarian For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Legacy Member emmagee1917's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    11-27-2022 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Yuma , Arizona
    Posts
    1,402
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 PM
    You do not want to fire rifle grenades from these stocks . For normal civilian use , they're fine .
    Chris

  8. #5
    firstflabn
    Guest firstflabn's Avatar
    Rick, I've long wondered what was the basis for the pins deficiency conclusion. Have you seen a primary source? I can't help but notice that both you and Poyer use the passive voice (it was discovered/it was found), instead of saying "so-and-so made a decision based on..." Of course, Poyer goes even further, claiming the pins actually weakened the stock.

    Having worked in materials testing and having read several Ordnance Dept test reports on other subjects, I understand the lengths they went to in developing physical tests that would produce valid results. Lacking such a report - or a credible account of one - I'm not quite ready to be convinced - especially by mushy language (plus it's out of character for you - we're spoiled).

    I'm too lazy to disassemble, so anyone have an empty stock to measure the shelf dimensions? Isn't it about 1/2" high and 1-1/4" deep? With that info, I'll try to crunch some numbers.

  9. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Johnny Peppers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-01-2015 @ 11:25 PM
    Posts
    1,810
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:13 PM
    The pins/screws show up again in very late S-C stocks. Whether S-C went back to them, or was just cleaning up left over stock at the end of the contract I do not know.

  10. #7
    Advisory Panel
    Rick the Librarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    04-09-2023 @ 08:59 PM
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Age
    74
    Posts
    2,301
    Real Name
    Rick Slater
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 PM
    Being compared to Poyer ... that's a low blow!!

    Poyer isn't the only source that claims that pins didn't hold up. Most other M1903 sources agree. As for "primary" sources, I couldn't tell you. However, if stock pins were working (which required much less in the way of labor and materials) why would Remington go BACK to stock bolts?

    I would not have a problem with using a "pinned" stock for the occasional shooting I (or probably most of the folks on this forum) do. For heavy day-to-day use or firing rifle grenades (which was one of the major uses M1903s continued to be employed after the M1icon Garand became top dog), I'd look for another stock.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    --George Orwell

  11. #8
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:16 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,838
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick the Librarianicon View Post
    I'd look for another stock
    You'd have to, because yours would be split.
    Regards, Jim

  12. #9
    firstflabn
    Guest firstflabn's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick the Librarianicon View Post
    Being compared to Poyer ... that's a low blow!!
    I thought you'd enjoy that. Hope you noticed the actual compliment later (kiss and make up time - I may need you sometime).

    So, the answer is: there's nothing beyond speculation as to the reason for the decision. Might just as easily have been superstition or bad assumptions if no tests were done. 'They musta had a reason' is fairly weak. What matters is whether they were right or not.

    I wish they had tested, as they had plenty of stocks in new condition - plus - they had piles of sophisticated lab gear to play with. Coulda had a field day carefully breaking stuff.

    I'd be interested in the results from sticking a pressure transducer between the receiver recoil lug and our dear little stock recoil shelf and take firing measurements - both with the recoil bolts properly tensioned and then with them a bit loose. That would tell something about margin of safety - both in resisting shear on the sides and crush at the front edge.

    Previously I calculated recoil from firing a rifle grenade. That came close to 5.5x larger than firing M2 Ball. Unless someone can show where rifle stocks regularly failed after firing their first (and only) grenade, then it becomes clear that there was plenty of safety margin designed in.

    Fatigue is another possibility, but even more difficult to test for, even before considering that wood fiber is not homogeneous like steel, or ceramic, etc. Variability in critical stock dimensions, wood density, are also possibilities. That just leads us back to my original point, so I won't belabor it.

    One last shot at Poyer - his idea (or whoever he got it from and didn't bother to mention) that the stock pins actually weakened the stock is ludicrous. A back of the envelope calc tells us that if you simply drilled a 1/16" dia. hole where the front pin goes - and left it empty - you would reduce the area resisting recoil forces by somewhere around 1/2%. Other complexities factor in, but that's not a bad proxy for loss of strength.

    If Poyer was no more discerning than to propose that the loss of well under 1/2% of bearing area was meaningful, his entire assertion loses credibility. If, however, he was relying on an official document, it has remained elusive. That's why I tried to dump it in your lap. I'll wait patiently (unless I can come up with something snarky to say in the meantime).

  13. #10
    Advisory Panel
    Rick the Librarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    04-09-2023 @ 08:59 PM
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Age
    74
    Posts
    2,301
    Real Name
    Rick Slater
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 PM
    I wish John Beardicon would jump in - he may have more details. I wouldn't say the replacement of pins by bolts to be "speculation", though. However, if you want "primary source" quotation, I probably don't have it.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    --George Orwell

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. US Red Cross arm band
    By RCS in forum Vintage Military Gear
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-27-2012, 08:28 PM
  2. 1903 A3 SC stock bolts
    By wineguy in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-27-2010, 09:42 PM
  3. 1903 Bolts Question Mark I ? RIA ?
    By 1941WillysMB in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-24-2009, 04:46 PM
  4. 1903 rifles looking for bolts with SN marked on body
    By RBruce in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-11-2009, 12:46 PM
  5. 77F with 30 MPH cross winds here
    By MJ1 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-16-2009, 12:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks