Lee-Enfield Mk1 No.4 rifle picture thread

I am posting this in hope that it will pick up because we all love to look at No.4 porn.

I am trying to figure out how to get a full picture without having to back up 10 feet resulting in poor quality photos.

Lets get it going gentlemen!!!!:beerchug:

https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...g?t=1264471737

https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...64471805-1.jpg

I have no idea what you're talking about but do have a pic or two of No.4's

WOW, nice group!!! :thup:

in the bottom pic, 4th one from the left is that a cruciform bayonet?

good eyes - yes it's a cruciform

Four Long Branch No. 4s

Here's two thirds of my collection.
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...ds122409-1.jpg

But No. 4's aren't smellys, those would be No. 1's, the Short Magazine Lee Enfield SMLE)
Here's a few of mine.
(PS; how do you post a large picture?)

It's nice to "accessorize" a bit, too. No.94 practice grenade.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by limpetmine

But No. 4's aren't smellys, those would be No. 1's, the Short Magazine Lee Enfield SMLE)
Here's a few of mine.
(PS; how do you post a large picture?)

---

seems as if you are correct, please allow me to edit my post so I don't come off as a :madsmile:

Does anyone have a good, close-up shot of a #4 receiver? I need to see how much gap is under the rear sight assembly, and I need a good, clear shot viewed from the right side. It was mentioned to me that my #5 is supposed to have had metal milled off under the rear sight, and there's supposed to be a larger gap there than under a #4 rear sight.

In other words, is this enough gap here for a "real" #5, or is this a #4 that's been faked into a #5? If it's a fake, someone went to a LOT of trouble, near as I can tell.

https://www.milsurps.com/images/imported/deleted.gif