My newly arsenal rebuilt Inland

I picked up this Inland 611548 , 8-43 barrel last month
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=218531439
A previous owner had cut down the type 3 band and installed a repop flip sight, scratching the barrel up in places as well. I had it reparked by Steve at ADCO and installed a full type 3 band and a Type 2 milled adjustable sight. Turned out pretty good IMHO, back to a nice honest postwar rebuild!
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...IMG_0335-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...IMG_0336-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...IMG_0333-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...IMG_0334-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...IMG_0338-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...IMG_0337-1.jpg

Classic rebuilt Carbine, nice wood. It is amazing how much different they look with the Type 3 and 30 rd mag, much more intimidating.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaveHH

It is amazing how much different they look with the Type 3 and 30 rd mag, much more intimidating.

---

You mean intimidating like an assault rifle?

LE, I'm liking it! and I would say a nice save.....Frank

CC, Assault rifle for sure.....Frank

I'm trying to learn more about stocks and handguards. Are those SA birch? If the stock is an SA, are there any markings under the buttplate? - TIA , Bob

No markings on the stock, unsure of the type of wood

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaveHH

Classic rebuilt Carbine, nice wood. It is amazing how much different they look with the Type 3 and 30 rd mag, much more intimidating.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CrossedCannons

You mean intimidating like an assault rifle?

---

First, nice job LE.

I like the fire power of the 30 round magazine. But I think the carbine just looks better with a 15 round magazine inserted. Better balance and more com packed. Adding a bayonet, flash hider, or recoil check, to me appears even more awkward. That's not to say I don't have all of those items. And everyone looks at things differently.
The old line "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JimF4M1s

First, nice job LE.

I like the fire power of the 30 round magazine. But I think the carbine just looks better with a 15 round magazine inserted. Better balance and more com packed. Adding a bayonet, flash hider, or recoil check, to me appears even more awkward. That's not to say I don't have all of those items. And everyone looks at things differently.
The old line "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."

---

Jim, agree about the bayonet, flash hider and recoil check. I think they make it look kinda goofy. Now a Model 1905 bayonet on an '03 Springfield looks WICKED![COLOR="Silver"]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LeagleEagle

No markings on the stock, unsure of the type of wood

---

It's Birch and a darn good looking piece of wood. Whatacountry has lots of Birch handguards to match. Regards, Rick.

I totally agree. It is like taking a light very handy well balanced weapon and hanging a bunch of junk on it. I don't like stock pouches or 30 rounders, as a camping tool up in the Warners, it is so easy to use , carry and point. If you can't get 'em in 15 shots, you won't in 30 either.