So how many millions of US rifles never had numbered bolts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TRGunner06
I enjoy shooting the old military rifles but am not really a collector.
I am delighted to hear that. Number fetishism can become a bore. And just think of all those millions of US rifles, like the M1917s, that never had numbered bolts. Are they therefore suspect? I think not. What matters, regardless of any number, is the metallurgical condition of the bolt (wear, possible setback of the locking lugs, sharp cocking piece ledge, check for safety-off fire and slam fire).
And I consider it to be AKWOTAM to have the headspace checked by a gunsmith. Evaluating a rifle by popping gauges made to modern SAAMI standards (commercial standards, please note) into an ancient military rifle that was most probably never built to such standards is a proven way to get a perfectly good rifle rejected. A famous type for this is the Swedish Mauser.
Apart from obvious damage and extreme wear, the 3 major items to be checked before you even dream of firing a cartridge in a newly acquired rifle are:
1) Safety-off fire
2) Slam-fire
3) Head clearance, i.e the end play when you insert a real cartridge (not a gauge) into the real chamber of that rifle.
It has just turned midnight here, so I will be brief. If you search the forums for the 3 key expressions listed above, especially the gunsmithing, reloading, restoration and BP forums, you will find a wealth of opinions, tips and knowhow on these 3 topics - and you will learn that you can check them all yourself without expensive tooling. And you will pick up a lot of associated information that will help you to understand what is going on in the chamber when you fire a cartridge.
But to answer your original question: a number on the bolt that matches the rifle is nice, but no guarantee that the rifle will function properly a century or more after that number was originally stamped!
:wave:
Patrick