Two Sterling converted rifles

Any opinion on the two attached rifles would be appreciated. I'm not very familiar with the Sterling conversions, especially as one of the two appears to be a converted No. 5.

Thanks,

Georg

Where on earth did they come from?

The first rifle (pic 1 to 4 ) is a No4 MK2 converted to 7.62 with a Sterling kit....complete and very correct. The second a No5, has a Sterling magand is in 7.62.....miising Sterling ejector and stripper guide.

I think that the "No 5" might actually be built on a No 4 action - from the photos, I can't see any lightening cuts under the rear sight, in behind the safety lever.

The No5 is a Charnwood, knocked together out of a No4 receiver and a Sterling No5 kit.

No4 is also someone's project gun made from a Sterling kit - judging by the fit and finish of the parts....

They came from the collection of someone who also published a book on Enfields. I have no doubt on the No. 4, but didn't know about the No. 5. As the price was fair so I had to take it.

The No. 5 was built on a No. 4 action as the bolt head has no lightning cut. And I had to make three edits now because I wrote that on my mobile.

The "19T" proof marks on both the receiver and bolt handle on the No.4 look more like a arsenal proofing mark rather than a export proofing mark, as typically seen on .303 rifles with the 18 Ton. proofs. Would a cobbled together rifle bear these marks ?

The knock off No5 might make a fun shooter! How is the Barrel.

I asked as I have a No. 5 Charnwood 7.62 conversion on a No. 4 action that I further converted to a Mk 2 trigger. My (very private) opinion is that the choice of a No. 4 action is a sensible decision. Yours looks like it´s been quite nicely done.

Attachment 32259

Removed the handguard of the No. 5, found this proofing:
https://www.milsurps.com/attachment....0&d=1332685559