Printable View
Hello!
Im new to this forum and to Lee Enfield rifles. I just got this rifle and need some more infromations. I found G162 in several places, so this must be serial number?
Thanks for help!
Attachment 37295
Attachment 37310
Attachment 37309
Attachment 37308
Attachment 37307
Attachment 37306
Attachment 37305
Attachment 37304
Attachment 37303
Attachment 37300
Attachment 37301
Attachment 37302
Attachment 37299
Attachment 37296
Attachment 37298
Attachment 37297
Attachment 37311
Rebarreled in 1918, what's all that gunk, grease or rust?
Gunk? :)
Its hard to belive but its a ground found. So number 18 menas that was rebarreled in 1918?
Can you see serial number?
Thanks for the info.
The '18 on the barrel shows it was rebatreled in 1918.
---------- Post added at 09:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:22 PM ----------
Yeah, that's 'rebarreled'....
---------- Post added at 09:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:23 PM ----------
BYW, welcome aboard! Two quick questions..'ground found'? Haven't heard that one.
And, uh, that MP38/40...real?? :)
Looks like you've got quite a bit of corrosion on parts, and you're missing your rear handguard and the ears have broken off your front handguard. But if by "ground found" you mean you dug it out of the ground, it looks absolutely exceptional!
Hello!
Thanks for the help.
Bouth are battlefiled relics, MP40 is real :) found about year ago, Lee i found some days ago, sorry if i posted some stupid questions :)
and complete bolt and sear spring is missing, ears of front handguard was cut off :(
Any ideas where could find missing parts, i want to restore it.
Link where i usually post my finds:
Digging in the rain :) at War relics forum
:)
S/n g162
Here's a similar old girl in the MKL ...
1917 ShtLE (Short Lee-Enfield) No.1 MkIII*
Does your rifle have a dent in the wood?
In the 1917 example above, note the large dent shown in the side of the forestock in a few of the pics of the photo virtual tour. At first glance it appears to be wood damage from some kind of impact, when in reality, it actually indicates that the stock of this rifle was from old supplies that had already been cut-out, in preparation for installing the front volley sight. By the time this rifle had been manufactured in 1917, the use of front and rear volley sights on No.1 rifles had been discontinued, as of January 1916.
http://photos.imageevent.com/badgerd...20_Medium_.JPG
(Click PIC to Enlarge)
Regards,
Doug
Hello!Quote:
Originally Posted by Badger
No, there is no large dent in the side of forestock
is there a data base of serial numbers so i can trace where is she from?
Regards,