Printable View
I know that the so-called "Tanker Garand" can be problematic.
Apparently many are simply made up from kits or miscellanous parts, with varying degrees of success.
I recently ran accross one that is based on a WWII Springfield receiver that was stamped TANKER on the side of the receiver.
Anyone have any information about these?
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...8e39c6eb-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...5d544632-1.jpg
You might want to try our Google CSE custom search engine located in the top right corner below the words "Advanced Search". It only searches our site using Google techniques and can be quite efficient. For example, in your case, type in the words tanker garand and see what happens ..
There's a lot of old discussion threads and pics on the subject.
Regards,
Doug
US Ordnance would not stamp the name TANKER on an experimental design being tested back in the 1944-45 period. Furthermore the original concept of a short barreled M1 rifle would not have anything to do with issue or testing by US tank crews. The name TANKER came from private venders that were selling these weapons
Thanks, RCS...I know that.
I'm trying to figure out which private vendor put these out and whether that vendor did a decent job on the conversion.
check jouster for the name
The screw on the elevation cap is sooo wrong.Looks like a machine screw.
Cast receiver?
Then it will probably only last so long before detonating...maybe that's why they're not more common...Quote:
Originally Posted by bob seijas
No, a 2,xxx,xxx SpringfieldQuote:
Originally Posted by bob seijas
I stand corrected.