https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...2be70gif-1.jpg
Printable View
Those aren't Dakotas are they, sort of hunchbacked at the tail...thicker...
If you are talking about the aircraft, They are C-46's. I flew into K-9, Pusan East in one.
Yes, that's what I was asking. I forgot you had firsthand experience there...looking at those guys must bring back some fond memories...and a few others.
Here's a couple of links of interest... Curtiss C-46 Commando - Wikipedia
Here's one showing how many remain, surprising after this time. List of surviving Curtiss C-46 Commandos - Wikipedia
The Brits, who like to call aircraft by names, called them the Commando. They flew me into Korea and out after my fifty mission B26 tour. When I was in the USAF, we hardly ever called an aircraft by its name, only by it number, ergo: B-47, B-29 F-51, F-80 except for Gooney Bird.
FWIW.
Did they ever get the C-46 fuel leak problem worked or or do they fly with an exception certificate and fire observers like the B-29s?
Bob
Bob
I do not know about the fuel leak in the C-46. I took only two flights in a C-46-one the worst (into Korea) and the other the best (out of Korea) .
I under stand that the C-46 did not fair well in the post WWII era as a commercial transport- due to high operating costs. The C-47 was OK and then the airlines started moving to the DC-4 and DC-6. Those two- R2800 engines burned about 200 gallons per hour, so a leak would have to be big to our run the engines.
FWIW
There is a TV show called "Ice Pilots" that takes place in the wilds of Canada. They fly a C 46 in that show,
BEAR
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:38 PM ----------
The C 46 did not have self sealing tanks that made it an easy target for ground fire. Not exactly what paratroopers like to ride in for combat jumps.