https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...a3_large-1.jpg
Date taken: November 1938
Photographer: William Vandivert
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...e8_large-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...a5_large-1.jpg
Printable View
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...a3_large-1.jpg
Date taken: November 1938
Photographer: William Vandivert
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...e8_large-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...a5_large-1.jpg
Pic #2 his eyes are closed.
That is probably a 4-digit rifle no higher than about 6000
surprising amount of gas blowing back. Bolt is fully back I battery and the brass is only about 8" away from the chamber in mid air.
I saw that too and wondered if that's characteristic of a gastrap...not having seen one firing... There's one at 2:43 firing and no signature like that. Again at 4:06.
I Have This Old Gun: Gas Trap Garand - YouTube
Not sure I would like to fire the weapon like that in #1 either way its gunna hit your collar bone, probably get a good smack in the nose by the thumb as well.
Serial number 2126 was Canfield's gas trap, I believe the gas trap that was shooting is one of the new manufactured front end kits, which are made identical to the original
I think that having a gas plume like the one in the second picture after firing each shot would be distracting at the least and flinch-inducing if it blew back towards the shooter as I appears to do.
I see the cheekbone resting on the thumb in the third photo. That would give the shooter a good 'weld' and a contact index to ensure the same position every shot. Looking closely at the first and second photos, neither shooter has that cheek to thumb weld. Cinders is right. A shooter could end up with a bloody nose from not being in just the right position.