I checked again and I have a Weaver K3, not the K4. Works great and looks the part.
Printable View
I checked again and I have a Weaver K3, not the K4. Works great and looks the part.
how is the eye relief on the K2.5 and K3.
Off the subject. What is a #4 Mk 1 T in immaculate condition going for these days without the shipping case. I have one and am thinking of selling it
Please dont hijack my thread.
Is the magnification 2.5x or 3x on the No 32. Also there seems to be many variants of the K2.5....any better than others for the No 4 T.
If you take a week or two on ebay looking at weavers,(under vintage scope or sniper scope) instead of fine cross hairs you will get them with a fine horizontal and post reticle, very similar to the no 32 reticle, and for under $100. The no 32 is 3.5 x, something to consider if looking at a weaver 2.5x, but you can get them in 4x commonly too.
thanks,
All the 4x weavers i have seen have a bell at both ends. Is there a 4x that is the same shape as the 2.5x. and 3x
I think you're right, all the straight tube ones I've seen are 2.5's and the 4's are belled at both ends. sorry about that, almost a good idea. You can tell plenty of us have thought all these over a few times, and for the same reason, how to make a budget no32 look alike shooter.
My K3 is belled at only the eye end. I have been toying with the idea of adding a narrow sun shade on the other end to look just like the No. 32.
Now here's the one to buy, its an authentic enfield sniper use too. Lyman all weather alaskan, they were used on canadian snipers, very rare. The scopes the canuck used were serial numbered and are top dollar, however lyman made many others outside that serial range and they're cheap.
ebay usa, 320418484697
thank me later...