As they were shipped at the height of the submarine war in the N. Atlantic, I have no doubts that at least some were lost. But I never heard about "half" being lost. Again, I'd be interested in any hard data.
Printable View
As they were shipped at the height of the submarine war in the N. Atlantic, I have no doubts that at least some were lost. But I never heard about "half" being lost. Again, I'd be interested in any hard data.
What is the correct stock for a 6/42 Remington 1903?
Probably an unboxed "spread" RLB stock. R L B
Fairly easy to track down lists of ships sunk by U boats. Finding and then searching the ship's cargo manifests would be a more daunting task. Info might be on line but i haven't found it yet. :) One would think that Ordnance would have tracked losses during the war so that critical items might be replaced?
Regards,
Jim
While it would certainly appear that small arms would be a critical item early in the war, in reality most of the small arms sent to England remained in almost if not unissued condition. The Model 1911A1 pistol was still being shipped to England in 1945 with the end of the war was in sight.
I think so Rick.....but it's close. As I recall, FJA started appearing around SN100,000. This rifle would also have 6 inspector's marks and a circle P. Remington used at least 3 OC cannon cartouches and this one could have either of the first two versions. If we can find out the letters between the crossed sabers, I can tell the date it was proofed. Regards, Rick.
Respectfully disagree - the FJA did not appear until about 3,200,000. I also don't think these rifles had six subinspection stamps. Four was the "usual" with more occasionally being added, I assume if something else on the individual rifle needed to re "re-inspected".