The Enfield was designed around the .38/200 cartridge which was basically a heavier bullet on a .38 S&W case. Someone has marked the S&W after the .38 maybe in a bid to make it more saleable .
Printable View
The Enfield was designed around the .38/200 cartridge which was basically a heavier bullet on a .38 S&W case. Someone has marked the S&W after the .38 maybe in a bid to make it more saleable .
I've not tried to drop a 38 special into one, would it fit? I have a photo somewhere of another Enfield marked in the same way. Whatever the reason, they are still an interesting revolver.
Maybe Crudgington's added it so there wouldn't be any mistake as to calibre.
I think that you'd be in difficulty if you fired anything other than the old .38" S&W cartridge in a .38" Enfield, regardless of whether it 'fitted'. We have a couple of revolvers showing 'other' cartridges that have been fired. It's easy to see, due to tne fact that the chambers/cylinders have peeled back allowing you to look inside!
I read that there were thoughts about allowing 9mm Luger to be fired with No2 revolvers, using a plunger and spring mechanism in the ejector to a) hold the cartridge to the rear and b) eject it - after a fashion. But the trials were unsatisfactory.
I amk of the old school where if it says .38" Enfield and takes .38" S&W cartridges, then that's what I put in it. Old fashioned but...........
to answer the question , yes it will drop in , albeit very loosely , but indeed it will be a bad experience should it be fired , i think it too long to allow the revolution of the cylinder and actuating of the fire control group but ... i never say never or always with enfeilds ...i will say DO NOT DO THIS ,
all that said , nice example of a mkI , shame you had to part with a fine example of a mkI** to get it , you really need both in your collection ,