Considering a good no4T v a modern Barnard action doing 1/4 MOA or better.....um I'd pick the latter all else being equal especially if the ammo is as old as the "T"!
Printable View
Considering a good no4T v a modern Barnard action doing 1/4 MOA or better.....um I'd pick the latter all else being equal especially if the ammo is as old as the "T"!
A shoot off between my L42 and my F/S Barnard over 3,4,5,and 6ooyds mmmmmmmmmmm. To be fair the glass on the L42 needs to be as good as on the Barnard then all bets are off. The HT, T and No3T using hand loads would be close. Pity the last 3 are not new to see just how good they really were.
We are confusing things here chaps. A sniper rifle is not and never will be a target rifle. Snipers don't just appear at nice flat grassy firing points, dropped off by car or Land Rover, believe me
You'd better bring it up one day and have a shot on the new range.
Wife's effort at 700M with her Barnard with 155.5 Bergers X ring is 127mm in Dia the 4 at 6 o'clock is a sighter we forgot to cross it off hence the large group size still a 60.08 is ok with 8 of those shots in there I do not run in a straight line believe me :rofl:, my No.4 T will never match that and besides P L is spot on with his reply snipers do not carry a nice flat cosey mound with them.....
Yep....., accuracy has to be good but it has to be good AFTER a lot of stalking and even after a container/CESP air drop too. When it's cold and wet and........ And if accuracy was the bee all and end all, then the P-H L81 rifle would have got the cigar. A sniper could never really compete with a target shooter. After all, we really want to HIT the person in the torso. If it kills him, even better. Just my take on things