It does though, it goes right through the end...look at it. That last part is just the edge. Here's one that doesn't for instance.
Yes, the ones like this that had been shortened were found to be weaker at the point.
Printable View
I stand to be corrected as always of course. But where is this officially recorded? They were big on the waste not, want not philosophy I agree. My opinion is only based on nothing more than the bleedin' obvious - and simple mechanics of course
" British and Commonwealth Bayonets" Skennerton pg 347 list sealed pattern from Pakistan, one of the descendants of the Indian Army, approval date 1941 MkI* and MkI** converted by shortening MkI bt to 12.2", II** having double edge at point. 1941 was also approval date for short IP MkII bt series.
One in my personal collection is a Wilkinson MkI convtd to I** and bearing Indian FR 56 stamp.
The U.S. also converted tons of the M1905 Springfield bayonet from 16" to 10" during WWII for reissue with the '03, '03A3 and M1 Rifle.
Has the thickness of the blade been reduced at the point by grinding an angle on each side of the blade? We don't have a picture looking directly from above, to see if this has been done, but, speaking as a metalworker and engineer, I think that it would produce the appearance of the fuller not running to the end of the blade.
Here is a link to an Indian shortened 1907 on World Bayonets Website: India - No. I Mk. I** (Pattern 1907) Bayonet
I am asking Jim, not arguing. This is what the U.S. 1905 bayonet looked like when cut down: USA - M1 Bayonet
See how the fullers run right through to the point.
Yes, this is a thicker blade at that point. So the edge is contoured and shows that flat surface...all the way up. They didn't make any that looked like that. The 1907 and that short Owen that look like a mini 1907 are the way they were done. Look in a search engine for Owen cut down bayonets and all these different cut downs appear, all a bit different looking. Peter is adamant that it's a local mod not MOD authorized or ordered...thus the differences. I wouldn't know but it makes sense. Thus the vast differences. I've cut a couple of scrappers to make them sell on today's market too...made a couple of "Original" fighting knives too... This one looks perfect, considering the weapons shop might be less apt to be cosmetic...
Here's an example of a 1907 blade that's been shortened, at some time or other. Because the fullers have the appearance of running right the way through to the end of the shortened blade, the sides of the shortened blade clearly have not been ground off at an angle to reduce the blade thickness.
SMLE No.6 KNIFE BAYONET | Spandau Militaria Shop