Yes... now I can see it better. It definitely looks like a 3...
Printable View
Yes... now I can see it better. It definitely looks like a 3...
The '3' bolt head might put some off a little. The rifle looks tidy although I suspect (difficult to be 100% certain from the photo's available) that the wood has been varnished & the body looks as though it is suncorited, which could be an ordnance refurbishment, but would not be 'factory original' for a Long Branch rifle. Assuming the metal refinishing was done in service it is really just part of its history.
Attachment 110537Attachment 110538Attachment 110539Attachment 110540Attachment 110541Attachment 110542Attachment 110543Attachment 110544Attachment 110545Attachment 110546Attachment 110547Attachment 110548Attachment 110549Attachment 110550Attachment 110551
Enclosed are additional pictures the barrel, the receiver and the bolt all match.
Looks OK, is the price low enough or reasonable? Still can't tell if it's a put together or not, the import mark is obvious but unavoidable on this one. I thought Canadian would have a Zamak butt plate? Pot metal blackened? No? Doesn't really matter...
Looks pretty good... We aren't being much help with value though are we?
Thank you for all the info, right now the bid is $595 but it still has until tomorrow evening.
I'll take a shot at value:
I'm thinking $595 may be the ceiling on this one, no more than $650 if someone really has to have a Long Branch.
Really pristine LB's tend to bring big dollars here in the US. I saw a beautiful 1950 LB go for $1100 at a recent auction. Ovidio's example is a beauty of rifle.
This one looks likes it's been sanded (stock markings barely visible). As Browningautorifle pointed out, the buttplate should be alloy, so it may have been replaced, but who knows when and where.
The two biggest points that turn me off are the paint, and the importers mark stamped so close to the Long Branch factory mark. I really cant tell if that's suncorite paint or barbeque paint. Early 90's imports had much more discreet markings near the muzzle or near the charger bridge, right hand side.
The #3 bolthead wouldn't bother me too much. I have an early No4 faz (with mag cutoff slot) fitted with a #3 head. The rifle is very beat and bears the marks of very rough handling. I shoot it occasionally (maybe once a year) with low-power reloads.
At the end of the day, it's your decision. Do you want it as a shooter, or just to have an LB example? How bad you want it will determine what you will pay for it. But honestly, IMHO, I think its a $550 dollar rifle. There are others out there....
Thank you again for the information
I thought it looked like a No3.Quote:
Originally Posted by MJE
That would indicate it has probably had a pretty hard life.
If you are successful it would be worth paying particular attention to the headspace, if a rifle is fitted with a No3 bolt head it is normally in the last stages of its life.
Base workshops, or the manufacturers (for example during FTR) were not allowed to send the rifle out with a No3 bolt head, they were only fitted 'in the field' or, on agreement from a Senior Examiner to 'keep the rifle going a bit longer'.
An old post (2008) by Peter Laidler :
When it was impossible to get CHS, using the old bolt and boltheads then a new bolt, you'd use the gauge bolt do the final check. If this failed then the rifle was scrapped as this calibrated bolt had deemed that the body locking lugs were worn through.
There is a little more you might need to understand before you can appreciate the whole picture. The No4 rifle was a very precisely made piece of gear. The very fine production tolerances achievable meant that every rifle could be assembled with any parts from production within set tolerances and be correct for headspace with either a No0 or a No1 bolt head fitted. To leave the factory, that was between .064" and .068" headspace. If a rifle failed headspace in service (failed the "field" gauge at .074") Then it was sent back for repair. If it could be headspaced with the next size bolt head (either a 1 to replace a 0, or a 2 to replace a 1) it was deemed good to go. If a rifle did not pass headspace with a No2 bolt head, then it was passed up the line to the senior inspector who would apply the Gauge, Inspectors, Selected Breach Bolt. If the receiver passed the test, it could be fitted with a No3 bolt head and put back into service.
NOTE HERE. A NO3 BOLT HEAD WAS ONLY TO BE USED ON THE SAY SO OF THE SENIOR INSPECTOR.
If it did not pass the test, it would have been sentenced Z for return to the factory, (even if a No3 bolt head would pass headspace)
Interestingly, I wonder how many rifles are out there with No3 bolt heads in them that the owners have fitted to keep them in headspace, when actually the receivers may be worn beyond reasonable limits.
Also I wonder about the amount of rabid buying in the past of number3 bolt heads and the owners who have fitted them because their rifles failed the SAAMI spec field gauge at .070", which is a good .004" below the manufacturers spec...
I would suggest, short of panic, anyone who has a No3 bolt head in a No4 or No5 rifle should own a .074" headspace gauge and check the rifle every couple of hundred rounds. If the hardness has gone (or becomes too thin from ongoing use) from the locking shoulders, the headspace will increase as the softer metal is extruded by the forces of firing. Checking and finding it failing with a No3 bolthead that passed a hundred rounds ago will tell you things are not right.. time to retire the rifle. NOT REPLACE THE BOLT BODY!
That is some piece of info!
Thank you very much Alan!
Thank you again Alan, after this information I decided not to purchase it and bought one from Classic, just waiting on shipping to arrive. I would like to ask what would be good additions to go with the rifle, I have already purchased the spike bayonet, scarab and frog to go with it.