Aren't the people who man those floating casinos in the Merchant Marine,or is it just a maritime union that they are in?,during Desert Storm 1 I heard a couple of them talking about a possible call up.
RayP.
Printable View
Anyone else see the demand by the left wing-nuts that Obama (that's right, Obama), be arrested and brought before an international tribunal on a charge of war crimes for authorizing the "wanton murder of three innocent young men in his insane war on terror."
This time the French have it right: Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
Jim
When the pirates are captured, you can't kill them according to "international law". So just sink their boat, put them in the water, hand them a 50 cent inflatable float and a 25 cent compass with directions, "home is that way".... 350 miles.... Have a nice swim... Wave goodbye and sail away!
Possibly, but not all....depends on where they are. River sailors aren't classed as "Merchant Marine", and have different documentation requirements. As for Unions, the "River Rats" have different unions than the rest of the "Blue-Water" industry....a LOT of them are non-Union...a lot of the rest are Teamsters. The Unlicensed crew in US-flag vessels are SIU (Seaman's International Union), SUP (Sailors Union of the Pacific) or USW (United Steel Workers...I was a member of USW Local 5000 for a lot of years).
Licensed personnel are different. Many are also Naval Reserve, particularly those that graduated from the Merchant Marine Academy (Annapolis-North)
And that sir....is defined as a "War-Crime" by International Conventions that the US has signed and ratified! You sink'um....you're responsible for their safety after the fact! Not necessarily disagreeing with you in principal....just pointing out the "Unpleasant Facts" connected with it.
Yes John:
But immobilizing their engines from a distance still leaves them with a floating "home". If they know how to rig a jury sail, then they will reach home. If not, then Achmed is enjoying the "fabled 77 virgins". Either way, removal of a problem. Dave_n
Don't shoot the messenger! It's still prima facia "abandonment at sea of surrendered combatants", and it's still (probably) a war-crime. A decision to do as you say is one of those "All your career can handle" deals if you are the Commander on-scene...and it doesn't take much to wreck a US Naval career! Given the (probable) legal situation, and the fact that Pres. Coo-coo Banana is running the show...I'd treat'um like they were on a Carnival Cruise Ship until their feet hit the beach!
FWIW, the US re-signed that stupid convention in 1994....knowing it was complete horse$hit in "real" Naval warfare, but did it anyway!
Well there is another way of looking at it. If they attempt to board a ship by firing rifles, machine guns, or RPG's You are just defending yourself against them, and if your "defence" is a bit "drastic', you are still defending yourself.
Again, its a big ocean, and the alphabet news networks don't have cameras with the pirates.
I just wonder how much "Operational Discretion" our ship commanders have with Cookoo Banana as POTUS? I'll bet they have to kick ANYTHING up to and including using fire hoses "Up The Chain"!
40mm. Bofors anti aircraft guns in direct fire would do the trick.The idea John, is kill their children before they kill ours. Nick