Peter,
Good question, when I get a moment I'll browse the files and see if i can find any other consecutive numbers.
Cheers,
Simon.
Printable View
Welcome Back Simon! Thanks for your time! Very much appreciated.
G'day Simon,
I have been directed to your forum as I am trying to find the histiry of my Enforcer serial No 400. I recently purchased it from the UK and imported it to Australia. Can you help.
Cheers MacBain
"Updates and Revisions" (Sorry- it's an inside joke...)
A sharp eyed and appparently relentless researcher has notified me that one of my rifles has been recorded on this thread with an incorrect prefix letter. And he seems to be correct!
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...SC017501-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...DSC01750-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...DSC01726-1.jpg
Make that first character a "C", not a "G". (BAD overstamp during a rebuild it seems)
Whoops! On several folks' part on multiple occasions.
I invite the fine, observant fellow to step forward and ID himself. I shan't give him up without permission.
So if the serial number is prefixed with a C what is the name of the signatory on the label ?Quote:
Originally Posted by jmoore;196203[url
There looks to be a distinct difference between the two letters - I'm going for the serial number being a G
Perhaps Simon could tell us if C31808 is on his list, Also is the bolt or woodwork numbered and with what number?
Just for ease of reference, the rifle with the confusing S/N prefix can be found in several photos on the below thread (if the link works, just click on it- I'm using an antiquated IE6 computer right now, so...):
L42 Photos
"l42 Photos" (
Ian Cooper the senior BOD small arms examiner got it wrong again.
There, another useless but lost bit of Enfield info for you all................ Don't try and phone him on that number he's retired now and it was the old Army phone network number!