Originally Posted by
Thunderbox
Ed,
with all due respect, I think you are really over-exaggerating an issue that doesn't really exist.
Apart from the odd broken No1 extractor spring, I've seen no evidence that Enfield spring properties change over time in a way that is in any way detectable to a shooter. I've never come across a striker spring - even in something as old as a Metford - where you could clearly detect a change in trigger weight and/or striker speed simply by replacing the spring with a new one (and lets not forget that the replacements you advocate are themselves over sixty years old - even, in many cases, older than the OEM items in the rifles..). I've certainly never come across a striker spring that has expanded in diameter to the point where it becomes friction fit in the bolt body. Rifle actions don't deteriorate simply because they've been in Turkey, India, Africa or any other environment - even real bitsas still function if they're clean enough.
Having observed hundreds and hundreds of Enfield shooters, I'd say there is rarely any point in attempting to fine tune an Enfield action - ammo, barrel condition and bedding errors are orders of magnitude more significant (I'll not speculate on what percentage of shooters might actually notice a difference between a 1 moa rifle and a 6 moa rifle....). Encouraging people to go out and buy parts they don't need is simply going to empty the parts pool for future generations of Enfield owners - all those springs, boltheads, extractors, sears, cocking pieces, etc will be dispersed & forgotten in a million tool sheds..