5 Attachment(s)
Webley MkVI in leather holster
This is a copy of a post on the British Militaria Forum The pictures are not displayed on that forum, so I hope that they will be visible here and somebody can answer my questions.
Up to now I have only seen Webleys in the canvas holsters. But I have just acquired a 1918 Mark VI. Number 102xxx, with "SOS" arrows and BNP civilian proof marks.
Attachment 25231
Obviously "low mileage", in perfect shooting condition, no wobbles, shakes or grinds, and with a fading blue finish rubbed in the places one would expect.
Attachment 25235
If you can't read the markings, that is because of my poor photography - they are all there, crisp and clear.
And it came packed in this:
Attachment 25232
Which I presume to be a military holster, as it has a square buckle on the back (can someone please tell me what that is for)
Attachment 25233
and a little brass lug on a side flap at the front,
Attachment 25234
which I can only assume is for the lanyard. Could someone please post a photo of the correct lanyard, and reveal how it was fixed so that it did not slip off the lug? Or is the square buckle for the lanyard? In which case, what is the purpose of this lug?
And finally - the leather is supple, but the original black surface finish has cracked and softened to the point where it comes off if you merely brush it with a fingernail. How can I preserve the leather? - I want to shoot the revolver, not keep it in a showcase! I would appreciate any advice based on long-term personal experience. I say long-term because what I have found on the forums varies from "do nothing at all" to complexe soaking and drying recipes, and some of that may be quick fixes that harm the leather over a long period.
Does the black finish give any clue as to the service use of this revolver? There are no regimental markings. Was it perhaps accepted by the army and then quickly sold out of service as surplus at the end of WW1?
Thanks for any information and advice!
Patrick
:wave:
Flexolan leather dressing - any experience?
Many thanks jmoore! That is precisely the thread that stuck in my memory as having caused me worry and confusion. From it I deduce 1) no neatsfoot oil - but surely that is animal-derived oil? Or does it have dubious additives? 2) No petroleum-based components - fine, if manufacturers would only come clean as to what they use in these brews. One may assume that the competition has long ago analysed the product, so the reticence is probably in order to keep the buyer unaware. - My suspicion with regard to many such products is that if buyers knew exactly what was involved, they would realise that they could makes up gallons of the stuff for a fraction of the price!
So how about the Flexolan?
Patrick
:wave:
Shooting the Webley Mk VI
I tried out the Webley at 25 meters yesterday, using 265 gns RN-HB Silver Moly bullets from WM. The very first shot was a 10X. I hate that - you just know it can only go downhill from there - and it did. OK, all shots in the black, and the blackening on th eoutside of the cases indicates that my "chicken" load can be increased quite a bit.
Then I tried the 255 gn FN-HB bullets. I had expected that the cylindrical shape would help accuracy. Wrong. Shots were all over the paper, with no semblance of a group. I can only hope that increasing the quantity of powder will help.
The good news: as this was a "running-in" session, I cleaned the bore after every shot. It started off looking good, but at the end of the session it looked perfect! And the mechanism is a joy.
Back to the reloading bench. And if anyone out there has some experience of using these heavy bullets, I would be delighted to hear about it.
Patrick
:wave: