Printable View
Hope some of ya'll can shed some light on this. As I keep my eyes open for a nice M1917, I've noticed that a number have butt plates that are too small - i.e., the wood overhangs the metal, mostly in the heel. Replacement stock? Wrong butt plate?
Thanks in advance,
John
Does this plate make my butt look big?*
Sorry for the bad joke.
Should have known I would get that! (LOL). But seriously, I'm wondering if P14 or some other types of plates are sometimes installed on M17 stocks.
How much of an overhang are you talking about? My Eddystone stocks are about 1mm proud of the butt plate, all around the rim, and the toes are slightly rounded. My Enfield No 4 stocks are also noticeably proud of the butt plates. Without taking everything out of the cabinets to look, I think this was probably normal procedure in mass-production stock-making, as wood proud of the butt plate does not cause any problems, but a butt plate proud of the wood certainly does (cuts, hang-ups on clothing). And a "sharp" toe is liable to become chipped. So if I was a manufacturer, I would have the machinery set up so that the thinnest butt was always wider then the widest buttplate.
It is the ones where the wood is precisely down to the level of the metal that I would look at more cautiously. In many cases, I think you will find that the wood has been sanded and refinished. In cases where the metal is proud of the wood, this is more obviously so.
:wave:
Patrick
---------- Post added at 06:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:55 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnu
As far as I know, there were no dimensional differences between P14 and M1917 butt plates. "The butt plate assemblies on Pattern 14 and Model of 1917 rifles are identical (except for markings) and interchangeable. ...remained unchanged throughout their service lives." (Stratton, p.75).
the 1928 SMG used a 17 style plate as well, Proud is normal of a stock thats not been sanded heavy.
Thanks for the confirmation Chuck. BTW, what's a 1928 SMG?
:wave:
Patrick
1928 Sub Machine Gun, tommy gun.
see, now when you find a US made sling thats marked SMG...youll know what it fits,:}
The Browning BAR Model 1918 used the same buttplate as the Model 1917 Enfield rifle. The Thompson Model 1928A1 buttplate will not fit a Model 1917 stock because the top tang is angled upward by a 1/4 inch. You could bend the top tang down to a 90 degree angle on the Thompson buttplate and it would fit.
notice i said.. 1917 style buttplate???
Thanks, everyone - this information helps a lot.
John
My 1917's buttplate (early 53,xxx reciever, apparently rebuilt post WWI) with an Eddystone stock is slightly proud on the left side and the toe, barely proud on the right. It does not appear to have been sanded. Most unsanded military stocks I have seen are slightly proud. Hope this helps. CC