Let Me Defend My Position
First, I don't know ABCLeigh, or whatever name he might go by, and I don't really care if ANECTINE pays him or not. I know that almost everything ABC sells is reproduction and I paid $ as a beginning collector for that knowledge. I asume that GunBroker rules are about the same as ebay & all the other auction sites - a winning bid is a CONTRACT. I am not a lawyer but I believe that if there is no definitive evidence (writings, images, witnessed oral claim, etc.) to prove intentional fraud then I must assume the the contract is valid and enforcable. In my opinion ABCLeigh did not say the sight was an original USGI WWII item nor did he say the words 'Irwin Pedersen' on his auction page. He did not say anything about the item in a descriptive sentence, other than maybe the shipping cost. ANECTINE interpretted the TITLE of the auction to describe an ORIGINAL M1 Carbine sight manufactured by or for Irwin Pederson in WWII for installation on an Irwin Pedersen M1 Carbine. In my opinion he had no right to make that interpretation and if he did do so without further study and inquiry then he should not be relieved of his responsibilities under the terms of the contract. I believe defacto fraud was perpetrated but I cannot prove it because no claim of originallity was ever made by the seller. If ABC sends ANECTINE the sight that was shown and purchased then I believe ABC has fulfilled his part of the contract and so should ANECTINE. If not then where does it end but in 'every man make his own rules' chaos.
Finally, I can understand how some members believe ABCLeigh is a criminal, counterfeiting (sp) a$$hole and nobody should have to pay for any of his auction items. But, until we get a Federal law regulating interstate on-line commerce (be damn careful of what you wish for - you might get it) the watchwords are 'caveat emptor', and always have been. We have to use our common sense in all transactions - particularly on-line where we can not see the item before the bid or the person selling it. I am not a Democrat. I do not blame someone else for my ignorance or stupidity and I do not selectively interpret our laws and morays to best suit my own purpose at the time and I do not consider it to be my 'right' to force others to make me whole again when I step in it, just because I don't think I got a fair shake.
For you 'old time, Harry Truman' Democrats out there, I am very sorry to be so blunt but you are a vanishing breed and the shortcomings of character I describe above seem to me to be the rule of the day. IMHO as long as people put up with it out of political correctness we will continue on toward oblivion. To ANECTINE, I don't mean to demean you in any way, particularly since you appear to be ready to take responsibility for your own actions. Like I said before, I have been there and learned from it, and so will you.
End rant here. Semper Fi. ChipS