Hello there,
I am looking at a 1943 Lithgow No 1 Mk III that is marked FTR 1955
Was the Lithgow factory reworking these in 1955?
It has a 44 marked Slazenger stock on it.
Thanks in advance
Printable View
Hello there,
I am looking at a 1943 Lithgow No 1 Mk III that is marked FTR 1955
Was the Lithgow factory reworking these in 1955?
It has a 44 marked Slazenger stock on it.
Thanks in advance
Yes, the factory did FTR them into 1955. Most of the stock parts would have been new, occasionally a butt would be retained. Is it the butt or foreend marked '44 SLAZ? It could have been original to the rifle, often the receiver dates are behind original barrel dates (which give a better indication of original assembly) so the '44 dated wood could be original too.
Thank you...I will post some photos in a few weeks when I get my hands on it
Is that the one on usedguns? with the bayonet?
Yes..I think I got a good dealQuote:
Originally Posted by FTX03
I think the deal was pretty good too. I have a '55FTR and it is without a doubt the best finished standard rifle I own. It shoots better than I can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Eberhardt
Looking forward to some good pics, with the accessories!
Thanks for your prompt reply to my earlier post Son.
It will take a few weeks to actually get my hands on it but when I do I will post some photos.
It looks like it was never issued. Do you think this is possible?
Bastrad you beat me lol, Thats a beautful rifle
I hope it looks as good in the fleshQuote:
Originally Posted by FTX03
Unissued is quite likely, unused a bit less likely... proving either is near impossible.
You can only go off the condition you find it in. Exc. Cond is still exc cond. if it's had a few rounds through it and been looked after.
The reason I raised the possibility is the lack of unit marks on the stock and the fact that it was FTR in 1955. When was the change over to the SLR?
I don't really care if it was issued or not, it is just great to have found one in such good condition.