Could long branch rifle serial number 45L1151 be a real sniper?
Printable View
Could long branch rifle serial number 45L1151 be a real sniper?
Yes... I am finding serial numbers of Long Branch snipers made for tests and trials all over the spectrum of the serial number range.
Thanks Warren,Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
Any distinguishing marks or features that I should look for to determine authenticity? Was the scope number stamped on the wrist etc?
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Craig
I looked at the sniper that you are looking at on used guns and it looks legit !!! but it does not have a T or the TR marking the pads look like originals that were fitted by a factory as they are staked ,,, I was going to buy it but I already have a mint English No4 T,,, and the scope needs a clean as it's slightly cloudy
I got some better photos from the owner of this one, rear sight is missing. The pads dont look like they are staked but the photos arent the best. I have seen a few genuines lately that look the same?
Early Canadian pads were not stamped.
The punch marks on the early kit was done by the British.
The British were not happy with a few things we did but then we were new at the game...sniper wise.
A 1943 dated Long Branch sniper should not have a T or TR.Quote:
Originally Posted by lee_enfield223
To answer the OP, yes, it could be a real LB "T".
I would want to see pictures of the pads and a few other things.
As warren has pointed out more than once, sometimes the naysayers don't know what they are talking about, and sometimes they want it themselves.
Having said that I would want to have some detailed photos of the rifle and (if matching) LB scope mount before putting the money down.
And unlike a lot of the people (even on here) who typically say things like "it isn't/can't be real" I actually have some Long Branch snipers.
Thanks guys,
Should it have a scope number stamped on the wrist?
What other things should I look for.
Regards
Craig
this one does not have a number stamped on the wrist it looks like a standard no4 except for the pads, anyway that's what I saw when it was offered to me
This one turned out not to be a long branch sniper after all. The seller realised his misdescription and notified me. Full marks for his honesty.
You sure about that though Craig? In that has someone who 'knows everything' could have contacted him and said 'no rifle with that serial number could be a sniper, you're selling under false pretences etc...' Could be bargain time ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Eberhardt
The seller sent me three photos none of which shows any detail to be conclusive. I can make out the rear site is missing but the pads look to be installed properly and dont appear to be staked. The scope is the only item that can be made out clearly, I have made an offer on this one so we will wait and see.
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...c7373dc3-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...9efdacf1-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...d54cf037-1.jpg
He told me that it has a 52 dated barrel ... At least that part must be a replacement.Quote:
Originally Posted by H.e.s.h
Last I knew 7946 lived in Australia!
I canna see the markings clearly, but it does look like a LB No.4(T) to me. The scope of course is British.
The markings that are legible, and far and few, do look like Long....... plus the model number is in the correct spot, and the wood sure looks like good Canadian walnut.
A decent shot of the receiver side with the serial number and markings would clinch it.......
If no one wants it I will take it and have a nice Mk.1 REL scope for it.
I too am holding a very nice REL scope and original mount in reserve, waiting on a Longbranch 4T to come along. Please post the serial number and I might be interested in buying it.
David
I would like to see a picture of the rear pad with the rings removed....I think that would answer the question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren