-
7 Attachment(s)
MP-28 buttstock
The good news is it doesn’t have any cracks. The bad news is it’s filthy and badly beaten up.
Attachment 64891Attachment 64893Attachment 64892Attachment 64894Attachment 64895Attachment 64896
Attachment 64897
I am thinking I would like it to be cleaner, but I don’t want to go beyond that. So I am looking for some help from the woodworking experts. What’s the best way to remove the filth while keeping the patina? The small area around the cartouche looks pretty good. How do I make the rest of it look like that?
-
You can use the standard liquid stripper here and it will do magic. Things like acetone and varsol will take a while and you may saturate it a bit. You could try them on a rag though if you have them...I'd use a liquid striper, maybe a steam gun. That will also lift some of the dents...which I'm sure you aren't adverse to.
-
Okay then. Stripper it will be.
It’s in pretty sad shape, but MP28 parts are not thick on the ground here.
-
As a gun they're pretty forgiving so this should work out well. Besides, you've shown us you can rebuild it...this ought to be good. You do have the rest?
-
No. I don’t have all the rest, yet. It’s another one of my part-by-part projects.
I think the cartouche is Anciens Etablissements Pieper. There’s also a Liège proof mark on the magazine housing.
-
Back in the '80s, a good friend of mine had one here. It seemed a bit heavier than the MP 40 say, but I guess it would be functional. Good luck on the build.
-
Just illustrates the Lanchester ancestry doesn't it? But from that came the Sterling series although Patchett would never admit it!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Peter Laidler
Lanchester ancestry
That's right...
-
Yes, the MP28 is clearly the ancestor of the Lanchester. There’s even some parts interchangeability. The early Lanchester barrel seems to be identical to the MP28 barrel.
My Lanchester firing pin broke. It took a little fitting to get the MP28 firing pin in the Lanchester breach block and to my surprise it increased the rate of fire noticeably.
-
I thought the Lanchester was basically a reverse engineered copy of the MP28? i.e. an SMG was desperately needed in 1940 and the MP28 was known to work.
Slight change of subject; I was pleased to pick up a 'Lanchester specific' WWII Admiralty contract 1907 Pattern bayonet for my Lanchester yesterday. They are distinguished by the fact that they are marked 'WSC S294' on the ricasso and have a blackened blade.
-
Of Lanchesters...... We used to shoot one quite regularly at work using standard issue Mk2z ammo and suffered with a lot of misfires due to the caps not being fully punched. I mentioned this to one of our regular visitors and he suffered the same. But he cured his by inserting a grub screw through the side of the bolt, locking the floating firing pin block in place. Effectively making it a fixed firing pin working on the API system. Did the same to ours which cured it!
You mentioned early barrels Vince. Yes....., it prompted the memory cells that the Navy Lanchesters that we encountered from Sembawang did have two sorts of barrels but we only had the sort that were secured from the top. There was a drawing to convert these 'front-fix' barrel guns to top-fix to suit the barrels that were supplied. I have to say that the quality of the spare butt stocks was awful! Not just the interior but externally too!
-
The grub screw modification is interesting. The MP28 firing pin is a very tight fit, almost a press fit in the Lanchester bolt. I would say it’s working like a fixed firing pin too.
I will fix the barrel from below in addition to the front screw. Might be able to do it by using a longer magazine housing mounting screw.