Printable View
http://www.gunbroker.com/item/646814752
Is that a Type III Trigger Housing?
No pictures of the sides of the rear sight,
No pictures of the barrel band..
No picture of the Cartouche..
No serial number..........
Sold AS IS NO REFUNDS..
I don't get it ... :confused:
Bet that is a t3 slide where it should be a t1. Will have to look at the barrel later on an Ipad, there you can enlarge the picture and get a closer look for the shadow. Buyer is happy via feedback. Bet seller is also lol.
Yes, from the top rearward pic. That's why no close up pics.Quote:
Originally Posted by painter777
Cali, If you do manage to enlarge the photos, then look at the front of the stock on the nose for type 2 or 3 marks. It's not bad for a Winchester in the 1027500 range. The wear on the barrel may be from the type 1 band sliding up and down on the barrel. But the barrel is a rare bird in that it's a 2-43 dated barrel and it's correct to the serial number. The trigger housing is a type 1, hammer is correct as is the safety. If the stock is correct then the value of the parts is pretty close to the selling price on it.
Bruce,Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce McAskill
I can't see the bevel on the rear lug, but I can see that it is a Wide rear mag wall.....
---------- Post added at 01:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:33 PM ----------
I must be sitting on a fortune then....
WRA 1,030,631
http://www.milsurps.com/images/impor...DSC08587-1.jpg
No, what I see is the trace of the Type I band clamp where it rests in the assembled position. Pictures are not good, but I did not see the trace of a wide band on the nose of the stock either. The portion of the barrel that's darker is the part that is normally covered by the stock and hand guard which is normal and expected since it is not subject to wear and tear. I'm not saying the gun hasn't been messed-with at all but it looks pretty good to me.
If that's the carbine there in the sun the barrel looks different from the dingy pics.
That's Painter's, not the OP's.
Charlie, I enlarged the photo of the trigger housing and you can see the beginning of the tapper at the rear of the lug.
But still a Wide Rear Mag wall,
So a type II ?
Quite a few things I've seen from this seller were put togethers, it would not at all surprise me if that's what this is. If the seller wasn't in the hiding mode why did he post long distance photos? Yes, dated Winchester barrels are seldom seen, maybe that's why it went for more than three K, still don't think it's all that though.
I see that this Winchester buyer bought a QHMC and RMC from Sam T Bob on the same day.... plus or minus $4000.00 for those 2 Reproductions.
Buyers feedback was all about the nice packing as always by S-T-B.
I think that explains all !
CH-P777
Painter IS the OP. You mean not the gun on gunbroker...Quote:
Originally Posted by INLAND44
It is a possible type 2 housing. BUT it has been stated in some books that Winchester did not use the type 2 housing and only the type 1 and then the 3. But I do think it very well could be a type 2.Quote:
Originally Posted by painter777
Bruce,
Let me rephrase...
Is this TH a Wide Rear Wall housing?
Was there ever a Type I trigger housing with a Wide Rear Mag wall?
Thx
CH-P777
Charlie, If you go by Riesch it's a type 1. If by Ruth it's a type 2. But I would say it's a type 1 Winchester housing. I have never seen a type 1 with a wide housing. But the one photo even enlarged does not add any information to the question. I am pretty sure it's type 1.
My WRA 1,030,621
Type II TH,
Lets call it a draw, I have too much to do today.
Cheers Buddy,
Charlie
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...DSC08421-1.jpg
Hey, that's right. Why in the heck would he post another carbine picture in his own thread about another carbine?Quote:
Originally Posted by browningautorifle
Pictures are a very low quality, low pixels. When enlarged I think I see a T3 bb shadow and I think I see t2/3 BB marks on the stock but again pictures are poor and when enlarged REALLY poor.
First picture shows where I think I see the end of the T3 barrel band line and then the arrow pointing left would be the slight color change from that point....or it just could be me..
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...LguMjpg2-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...qCP7jpg1-1.jpg
Cali,
It's just to hard to tell.
Probably best we end this topic... If I may add this last note:
Some can't take good pictures.
Some Don't want to take good pictures.
Cheers,
Charlie-Painter777