Is there anyone out there in UK forumland who has a microfische reader? But not only that, a reader that will transfer onto a computer readable disc.
Printable View
Is there anyone out there in UK forumland who has a microfische reader? But not only that, a reader that will transfer onto a computer readable disc.
Plan "B" might be to find one of the old ones that had an integrated printer (often "thermal" paper), though they will be getting a bit long in the tooth, these days. The first thing to do with any resultant thermal printouts is to copy them with a modern "powder/laser"copier and to scan them for good measure. The reason is that the "thermal" paper is sensitive to sunlight and in general, will fade to a purplish-grey haze in short order.
Are these the "aperture card" type with the image element attached as a window in what looks a lot like the old "punch-cards" we used for FORTRAN programming on the old DEC-10 and PDP-11 computers in the mid 1970s? Or the ones with multiple "frames" on a piece of film about A5 size?
Some "out-of-the-way" council / municipal libraries may still have readers that may just work.
Failing that, some of the better "print service" shops have specialized digital scanners that can read them and print to whatever size you desire (Up to a max. of A0, normally).
Good luck.
Or, cheap and cheerful; one of these things, see attachment:
A Bell & Howell Microimagery Group. Microfiche Portable Reader. Model:Commuter 1318 BVFVZ.
This is a briefcase-sized reader only.
However, a decent digital camera on a tripod might be able to transfer the photons to electrons in your format of choice.
Cheers.
Yes, I see the point Bruce but I really want to read some trials documents to get them onto the forum, for the benefit of all. Not necessarily at any great expense to myself - if you see what I mean! Failing that, the info just remains lost 70's and 80's info. You're right that a good camera will/should pick up what's on the screen. The trouble there is that people now confuse a phone camera with a quality camera.
As Bruce says, which type?
If the single neg, contained in a card type, these can easily be scanned on most photo scanners.
The multiple image type on a sheet, might be just too small to be scanned on a average domestic photo scanner.
Peter, a university library would, or should, have everything you need to perform the task. Check with the chief librarians of research departments. You might even be able to secure an assistant with the promise of a bottle or two of someone's favourite libation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Laidler
Just bought an old 70's reader on ebay that I'll be using for the next few months. The things I do and expense I go to just to keep the Forum up to date with old fashioned stuff............
And to think we just skipped all of the out of date fiche readers with no thought to the future. I hated the bloody things!!
I take the point on board Paul S (thread 6) but really, I'm not doing this for myself at all. I'm trying to get/save the info for the forum brethren. But at the same time really don't want to spend time, travel and costs etc etc when it's not for me. Maybe I should sell the info on but that's not me either. Anyway, problem solved now.
Peter,
I can assure you what you hold will not be lost especially the PH stuff and I for one would place it in a searchable archive for Members Only so to speak on our Parker Hale forum, otherwise there will be those who will abuse its readiness and availability if its too easy to access!!! ;)
I'm now better placed to send you the P-H stuff Gil. Just had a browse, peering through a smoke encrusted screen at some Leatherwood stuff, comparing it to the No32. Too complicated by half apparently! The Envoy it was trialed against couldn't compete either. It's poor accuracy was put down to it being set up for use with US spec target ammo.
:lol::lol: smoke encrusted screen, love it. Been there at my local library, you can imagine in the day, someone trawling records with a non stop *** burning, doesn't help when you have to see a difficult screen already due to its size!! You would think people would clean the screen wouldn't you?;)
Incidentally, for anyone remotely interested, this trial was using that enigmatic Envoy rifle with a sound moderator and Leatherwood sight. This rifle combination has been pictured on this site a couple of times with a Marine posing with it at Bisley in (we know the date now....) 1971. The rifle was converted in the US by Leatherwood to use on the trial with a hope that they'd be a replacement for the No32/L1A1. It was impossible to accommodate the Leatherwood on the No32 bracket and as such, the eye relief was insufficient. This caused black eyes when shooting and stiff necks/discomfort when using the sight as an observation device.
On that basis, that rifle, wherever it is now is 'historic' in that it didn't match the L42 for, well....., anything!
Certainly black eyes not a good solution or relief on the eye!!