We have not had a quiz lately. I don't like the phrase "rare" but what pictured is seldom seen? (In my opinion)
Attachment 127808Attachment 127809Attachment 127810
Printable View
We have not had a quiz lately. I don't like the phrase "rare" but what pictured is seldom seen? (In my opinion)
Attachment 127808Attachment 127809Attachment 127810
The Pattern 1913 rifles are quite rare and the cartridges are not common, but the five round charger is almost never seen
Agreed, seldom see the P13 rifle but you don't even find the little charger clips at cartridge collector shows.
By the way, is that a #5 Mills bomb there? Another seldom seen artifact...I think they were made in 1915 only and so improved over that those disappeared quickly.
I think the sectioned Mills is a No23 Mk1. It's essentially a No5 with the base plug beefed up to take a grenade launching rod. The No23 Mk2 is also virtually the same but the base plugs are a little different (& more variable from manufacturer to manufacturer) in shape. The No23 Mk3 is the extensively redesigned No36 body with the No23 Mk2 base plug fitted to allow the earlier Adams (sheet metal) 'launchers' to be used with the 'new' No36 shaped grenades.
I think the rarest thing is to see no toes in the first picture.
Kidding aside, very nice! Are all four .276 caliber or is one altered in?
All four are unaltered/untouched.
The grenade base is marked No. 23.
I concur that the stripper clip/charger s the most seldom seen. I have only seen the two I have and I would not have known what they were without them holding one and five cartridges. The are unmarked as the cartridges never went into mass production with multiple production sources.
Boxed where I can't easily get to it, I have an Enfield produced excellent condition Pattern 1913 bayonet that went through the quillion removal process.
Is there a chance you could do a few pics to expose that one over in "Vintage military gear"?Quote:
Originally Posted by breakeyp
WW1 No3 Grenade launcher.
The bracket was fitted to the end of a Short Magazine Lee Enfield rifle and held a No23 Grenade which was fitted with a rod screwed into the base plate.
The No 3 Grenade Launcher was adopted to enable the launching of a No 23, or a similar bomb from a Lee Enfield Rifle, it’s base had a threaded hole into which a rod could be screwed, this was fed down the barrel of the gun after the launching bracket had been mounted. The former was then fired using a blank cartridge.
No5 Grenades had no hole in the base plate, but a No 23 base would fit a No 5 Grenade.
So it follows that many No 5 units can be found with No 23 bases.
The launchers intention was to hold the safety lever in place, after the pin had been removed, until the unit was fired.
Gotta love the ones that came out of the ground.
Here's one for you then Jim. A selection of ground dug stuff. Before anyone panics the rust & dirt encrusted No5 grenade is empty.....!
Anyone notice anything slightly unusual about the other No5 grenade?
The three launcher/lever retainers are the Adams type, named after Captain Adams of the RE depot at St Omer where he developed them. All three are ground dug but the one in which the original maker's marks are visible was obviously retrieved & cleaned up a long time ago. The one that differs slightly in shape to the other two is a two piece riveted together early pattern. I've never seen any reference to this variation, but the example shown came out of Bernafay Wood on the Somme about twenty years ago.
In case anyone else has more than a passing interest in British & Dominion WW1 era grenades, the two books shown are fairly new out - written since Covid by the author who is very well informed & a thoroughly decent chap.
And the odd No5 grenade.................? If you look carefully you can see a casting join around the two halves of the grenade......but in this case the join runs horizontally around the waist of the grenade, NOT vertically, as is generally seen. Early on in production both methods of casting were used, but the 'horizontal' join soon went in favour of the vertical pattern. It was found there was less wastage using left & right halves rather than top & bottom halves.
Must have escaped being thrown, would be VERY early I would think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Payne
Nice box of base plugs, don't have a spare for a standard M36 in there? Matter of fact, I need a whole parts set for one of my M36s. I should look up that UK company and see about it.
I have a charger in my accumulation, but I could only afford 1 of the 5 rounds in it...Quote:
Originally Posted by RCS
Four P13's!!!!
Good grief, I've only ever seen a single unmolested example in Warminster..
They must have an absolutely facinating history.
I'm a little late in my posts viewing but i'm sure glad i saw yours, it's nice to finally see what the chargers look like.Quote:
Originally Posted by breakeyp
I'm lucky enough to have found three of the .276 rounds over these last few years to display with my ''franken13''
Thank you for posting a picture, now i know what to look for... maybe one day...
Attachment 129189Attachment 129190
Speaking of stripper clips, a very odd duck is the clip for the .55 caliber Boys anti-tank rifle. All it is good for is to keep the rounds organized in the cloth bandolier. The user had to remove them from the clip to manually load the magazine.
That says an awful lot about the British military mindset of the period; don't get me started about army bed blocks in recruits battery circa 1966!Quote:
Originally Posted by breakeyp
Lovely rifles, a triumph of design, though the backsights could have been made much more robust. What a pity they couldn't swallow their pride and just adopt .280 Ross as the cartridge.
And another! Unfortunately, only one rifle with a single cartridge and no charger.
That one should be enough!