Do you still have it? And more importantly, have you shot it. I think this one will become the first of my display (only) queens.
Printable View
I have not fired my Rock Island s/n 64145 although the bore is really nice, I do shoot two other four digit Rock Island rebuilds, both having early SA pre WW1 barrels and early parts. I used an auxiliary chamber adopter to fire 32 ACP and 32 S&W short, now I can also shoot 32 S&W Long. These sub caliber inserts work out nice in your indoor pistol range or basement range. Interesting that the 30M1 carbine is not a good choice because of the velocity and bullet weight ! I noticed that I posted my four digit SA by mistake
My favorite early 1903 is a Springfield s/n 160963 with a SA 2-07 dated barrel and a "no bolt" stock with the CCV cartouche and inletted just like your Rock Island stock.Attachment 97013Attachment 97014Attachment 97015
Due to the non professional installation of the front sight base and the rear sight base, I think it is a good possibility that your rifle is a restoration.
Here are some photos of the front sight studs or bases.
left is ram rod bayonet 1903 front sight base
middle is the 1903/05 front sight stud as found on sn 8485
right is the late 1903 stud used until the 1903A3
note the location of the stud pinAttachment 97017Attachment 97018
RCS, Thanks for posting those photo's. That's a very impressive collection you have at your fingertips. Makes a great reference! By comparison, I only have one other 1903. It's another RIA made just after the heat treatment changes. (I did own a sporter when I was in high school that's long gone - remember the days when a high school kid could buy a rifle?). Anyway, I did pull my later 03 out to do those comparisons, but having the uninstalled parts to look at is even better.
Attachment 97019
The photo's I shared of the front and rear sights (& bases) were intentionally taken to show the specifics that were unique to the ramrod bayonet barrels that were shortened for the 30-06 cartridge. As you know, those things (that I am aware of) are the front sight base pin location, the exposed slot/keyway at the rear of the front sight base, and the no longer used transverse groove visible through bottom of the rear sight base. Since those differences are expected, I figure there must be something else visible in the photo's to have a determination made they were installed by a non-professional. Since I posted this thread so I could learn things, I'd like to know what those things are. Thus my earlier question for elaboration. When you're looking at these photos, do you see anything that raises a flag?
Unless I am seeing things, the transverse pins for the rear sight fixed base and the front sight base are visible. They would not have left the arsenal that way. Also, I am wondering if the spline on the barrel for the front sight base is present.
Nice one RCS, if your rifle bbl and #64145 receiver are original to each other it is then according to the serial number, one of the first rifles as originally assembled off the line in the beginning of 1907. Apparently the arsenal got the approval to begin producing new rifles off the line in 1907 and those are made with all new and the correct dated parts. Prior to 1907, RI rifles are found as being assembled from misc earlier and later made parts were the bbl will not match the serial number date.
I have one like yours having the serial number #87241 originally produced off the line with the correct matching bbl date of 6-07. Ray