Thanks to Doug, (administrator) I'm back on line. Was not my intention to seek an evaluation of it but wouldn't mind if someone did. Here are the photos
Attachment 102713Attachment 102710Attachment 102711Attachment 102712Attachment 102714Attachment 102715Attachment 102716Attachment 102717
Attachment 102724A few photos of the scope pouch I have for it, not matched to the scope. And a photo of the magazine stamps.
Attachment 102721Attachment 102720Attachment 102722Attachment 102723
Nice, I have only seen and held one it belonged to John Sukey and that was several years ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayg
A MkIII scope seems to have snuck into the photos (in addition to the MkII scope)
Ha ha, sneaky little bugger isn't it. That scope belongs to my all complete matching 1944 kit, scope, case, chest etc. Both photos of the case are of the same pouch just the front and back, Ray
Just for info I had the rifle listed incorrectly on Surmil's Trials rifles chart thinking the heading was asking if the scope was matching, and I marked it no. However after recently rereading the chart, I see it meant if the rifle was matching and should have said yes. Ray
A1374 1931 No4(T) Rose Bros. No No 6041 KL 14603 WW (No) rayg "Mk.VI magazine".
Not an easy rifle to find in unaltered condition. Missing cutoff and sanded wood hurt value. Nice rig.