Search:

Type: Posts; User: John Beard; Excluded Forums: Milsurp Knowledge Libraries (READ ONLY)

Search: Search took 0.04 seconds.

  1. Replies
    11
    Views
    3,202

    Correction. A military company armorer (i.e., a...

    Correction. A military company armorer (i.e., a GI), not a Remington company armorer.

    J.B.
  2. Replies
    11
    Views
    3,202

    Permit me to clarify further. The most logical...

    Permit me to clarify further. The most logical explanation is quite simple.

    Someone took a 1942 Remington M1903 and simply replaced the barreled receiver with the 1927 SA barreled receiver. It's...
  3. Replies
    11
    Views
    3,202

    Your rifle was not overhauled by Remington. The...

    Your rifle was not overhauled by Remington. The most logical explanation for your rifle in its present configuration is that someone replaced the original Remington M1903 barreled receiver with the...
  4. Replies
    11
    Views
    3,202

    Your rifle's barreled receiver was manufactured...

    Your rifle's barreled receiver was manufactured in very late 1927 as a replacement for a low number barreled receiver on a rifle turned in for overhaul. The receiver was manufactured from a nickel...
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Milsurps Talk Radio