-
Legacy Member
But didn't come here to tell us...wonder if he'll ever come back?
He came here as I told him on the other site this was the place to get a honest opinion on the gun. Knowing nothing on that gun thought the guys here would be the best source of information and I was right.
Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to enfield303t For This Useful Post:
-
03-18-2018 07:01 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Yes, sure giveaway is that on the real deal there is no data blocked by the scope mount. So, the rifle is a forgery.
Also, the scope is a Weaver 330 which is the correct model EXCEPT that is the civilian version. The military version had thumbwheels to adjust, whereas the civilian version needed a screwdriver.
-
Thank You to daveboy For This Useful Post:
-
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
daveboy
sure giveaway is that on the real deal there is no data blocked by the scope mount
An excellent rule of thumb even for novice to know.
Originally Posted by
daveboy
the scope is a Weaver 330 which is the correct model EXCEPT that is the civilian version. The military version had thumbwheels to adjust, whereas the civilian version needed a screwdriver.
Another excellent way to tell and one that would be overlooked by novice.
-
-
Advisory Panel
It seems that the OP was here today, but didn't comment in this thread.
I think that as a general rule of thumb, because of the substantial premium that sniper rifles can bring, it is best to assume one is a fake or clone until it is proven otherwise.
As far as simulated 03A4s go, I acquired a badly bubba'd sported A3. A friend helped out with a scant stock, and I got the metal bits to put it together from GPC. The receiver already had more holes that a slice of Swiss, so I didn't feel bad about mounting a Redfield base, and a Weaver 330. Resembles an 03A4, and has all the non-original tells that the rifle in this thread exhibits.
As scopes go, a 330 is pretty basic. But the rifle shoots very well. I've tried it on Larue self resetting targets back to 300m. No problem knocking them down.
-
Thank You to tiriaq For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
daveboy
The military version had thumbwheels to adjust, whereas the civilian version needed a screwdriver.
You are really correct for the A4. All the A4 pics I have seen in the Army docs from WWII have been the type with the thumbwheel. But what has suprised me is the huge amount of the silent screw type weavers, or whatever they call them in the Army and Marine docs.
Other than the A4, almost all Weaver scopes I see in the actual sniper docs are considered commercial.
I'm only going to include two pics, one from the Garand sniper testing. And one from a sniper Carbine testing. But I have much better pics of these and pics of these type of scopes on other rifles such as the Johnson rifles for the Marines, and M70 WRA's for the Army, and the M1903 for the MArines.
But those documents I didn't find at the archives, and I think it would be sort of crappy for me to post the pics, since I'm not the one who found them. But these two below I found , so I feel like I can share them.
So I do have pics of these type of scopes in the military. And at least for the Marines, I had documents of them ordering both the commercial 330 Weaver and 440 weaver in 1940.
I've never seen one on a A4 pic from WWII, and I have a lot of A4 docs. But it seems like every other sniper program, I have pics of them being used on. So it does appear the military did have some of this style.
Last edited by cplstevennorton; 03-20-2018 at 06:26 PM.
-
Thank You to cplstevennorton For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
Perhaps local purchase for testing?
-
-
Advisory Panel
I suspect the 330 was used because it was available. What was the Brit reaction to the No. 4 rifle/330 scope combination? "The sight might be suitable for a miniature rifle" or some such dismissive response.
-
-
Legacy Member
The scope is an M8, not a 330. According to Bruce Canfield, the War Dept ordered the M8 scopes with the post & reticle crosshairs, & the knob adjustments. Reasoning was, a screw driver wasn't needed to adjust the scope.
I have seen several M8's with screw adjustments, like the one seen here, that looked unmolested. I would guess that it took extra time for Weaver to get knobs made, & the War Dept accepted the first batch with screw adjustments because the need for scopes was critical. (There were would be no reason for a subsequent civilian owner to remove the knobs.)
-
Thank You to Neal Myers For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Weaver made scopes that carried both the 330 and M8 markings (on the same scope). M8 can be found in pretty much every combination that the 330 marked scopes were, S (silent, slotted adjustment) and C (click, with finger knobs) and both post and crosshair reticle. I will say I haven't seen much in the post reticle on the 330 marked models though. But then again these have been around a long time and were refurbished quite a bit.
I do know the Navy had used several weaver models made at the time. They had the M29/29S/329 (same scopes), 330 and as Steve mentioned the 440 but any Navy ones I've seen were the S (screw slot). These were used on bore sighting fixtures. I've had a few of these models and had an opportunity to buy repair parts for them that were still in military marked packages.... been kicking myself for a long time over that one. Anyhow, would be nice to find docs of the 440C use on A4 since those were easier to get than the 330C/M73B1 I might still have a couple.
-
Thank You to Randy A For This Useful Post:
-
For the OP - I would suggest a valuation of not more than $600.00 US for a badly done M1903A3. The scope, mount base, and probably the stock and bolt are all fakes or bad reproductions; the bayonet band is off an 03.
The Weaver "330 Scope-M.8" was a commercial scope. Probably prewar left over merchandise scrounged up by Weaver. Early in 43 Weaver was rushing to make deliveries to Ordnance so Remington could complete the rifles. They acquired as many unsold 330 style scopes from their domestic distribution channels as they could.
-