+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Chile Mauser with British proofs

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:44 AM

    Chile Mauser with British proofs

    I know it is not a Lee-Enfield, but someone's general knowledge might explain how a DWM Chileicon Mauser type 95, cut down to make a carbine, with no national emblem, comes to have Britishicon civilian (London) proof marks. Please take a look at my posting on the Mauser forum. Maybe one of you can help!

    Patrick
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member jrhead75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    02-03-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    354
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:44 PM
    My best guess would be a Boer War bringback, the "ST"monogram being the original owner's initials....but it's just that, a guess.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    01-10-2022 @ 02:07 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    12:44 AM
    Those London proof marks are of a style that was used until the 1980s, so the rifle could have passed through the UKicon trade at any time post-WW2.

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:44 AM
    Thread Starter
    Yes, but according to Wirnsberger (P107), after 1925 it was compulsory to stamp "not Britishicon made" on the barrel. Hence the later date limit.

    Patrick

  7. #5
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    01-10-2022 @ 02:07 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    12:44 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chadwick View Post
    Yes, but according to Wirnsberger (P107), after 1925 it was compulsory to stamp "not Britishicon made" on the barrel. Hence the later date limit.

    Patrick
    I don't have a copy of Wirnsberger, but AFAIK there has never been a requirement to stamp "not British made" as part of civilian proof - in fact i don't think I've ever seen it on a UK civilian proofed foreign arm.

    "Not English Make" and an encircled military mark was once a very old method of marking a foreign weapon for British military use, but those marks have no relevance to civilian proof, which your rifle displays.

    The type of marks on your rifle were used by London Proof between 1925 and 1989, when the pressure indication was changed to Bar from Tons, and the cartridge length to millimetres from inches.

  8. #6
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:44 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thunderbox wrote:
    "I don't have a copy of Wirnsberger, but AFAIK there has never been a requirement to stamp "not Britishicon made" as part of civilian proof - in fact i don't think I've ever seen it on a UK civilian proofed foreign arm."

    I did indeed make a slight error. The text was not "not British made" but "Not English Make".
    Apart from the fact that Wirnsberger's book is worth having, the information can be dug out of the internet if you have the time. Do a search with the string:

    British proof marks "Not English Make"

    and you will find enough examples. For an example of a UK civilian proofed foreign arm, please see

    http://www.coltautos.com/1908vpbp.htm

    The requirement to apply this text was in force from 1925 to 1955. So I still reckon the rifle was proofed between 1904 and 1925.
    On the butt, right side, there is also a very faint stamp about 3/8" diameter, showing the number 20 within a circle. I agree with jrhead75 that the monogram is most likely personal initials. Which leaves the symbol in front of the number as about the only means of identification. Any thoughts on this?

    Patrick
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 08-31-2010 at 04:35 AM. Reason: Link added

  9. #7
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    01-10-2022 @ 02:07 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    12:44 AM
    The marks on the Colt appear to be military view marks, rather than civilian proof.

    Is this an example of your rifle? :-

    Firearm Technical Trivia, December 1999

  10. #8
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:44 AM
    Thread Starter
    "The marks on the Colt appear to be military view marks, rather than civilian proof."
    Thunderbox, you are absolutely right. Back to the drawing board!

    Thanks for the link. If you look closely at my pics, you will see that the Spanish carbine is not what I have.
    I had a long chat with a knowledgeable gentleman from Hermann Historica today. And also found several examples on the internet with the mystery symbol in front of the number. It seems that I will have to upgrade my Ball to the 4th edition, which now has a section on ZAR.
    I appear to have the following: an example of the first series (no series letter) of 93-based full-length Mausers ordered by ZAR from DWM.
    What follows is, of course, just a plausible interpretation - it could have been different:

    The rifle came into the hands of someone who wanted a carbine.
    The Boers were largely a mounted force, and carbines were preferable on horseback. (Apparently the Boers also liked to remove the sight protectors from the carbines, as one in a hurry one could easily aim over the "ear" instead of the foresight blade)
    So "Mynheer S.T." had his rifle converted into a carbine. And cut the crest on the right side. (Or maybe he was ín a commando called "S.T."?)
    At some stage the rifle was captured or turned in after the end of hostilities, when it was "acquired" by someone who took it back to the UKicon as his private property, and had it proofed.
    Somehow it made its way to Germanyicon, without acquiring the importer's stamp one usually sees on imported rifles - even on re-imports of German origin.
    As many forum contributors have written on various occasions - if only they could talk!

    And now I have it, and am going to find out how well it can (still) shoot.

    Thanks to you all for your comments!

    Patrick

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Help with P Proofs
    By The Lemming in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 08:34 PM
  2. Enfield No 4 Mark I .303 British caliber rifle. British sniper rifle
    By Oatmeal Savage in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-27-2008, 08:44 AM
  3. 1896 Swedish Mauser 6.5x55mm (Mfg by Mauser Werk Oberndorf) (CGN Private Ad)
    By Badger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2007, 07:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks