+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Maintenance and the Collecting of Milsurps

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member 22SqnRAE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Last On
    09-27-2023 @ 11:49 PM
    Location
    Brisbane - the middle of right side of Oz
    Posts
    304
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 AM

    Maintenance and the Collecting of Milsurps

    I write this thread with the aim to learn and understand. Your input and views will be helpful and may assist others, so please share your thoughts.

    Recently I’ve bought several items from collectors, to improve my collection. Mostly rifles, but other items like bayonets.

    Being a little mechanically minded, inquisitive (and frugal,) I will strip, clean and inspect every item I receive. Inspection may reveal repairs or replacement parts required and that will initiate that maintenance task. The replacement part may be a 2 week or 3 year search. It’s part of the game. I must disclose a technical appreciation of mechanical things and have employed it, in particular a detailed working knowledge of rust control and effects, for several decades, as a professional.

    What strikes me as confusing, is the common condition of almost every artefact I’ve bought from another collector. They’re dirty. Filthy in some cases and certainly questionable as to their serviceability. Caked in old grease, crud, dirt, mank, grub, goo, unidentified stains etc… Certainly not the condition that a soldier would present the said item to the staff at the Armoury or Q Store on return.

    As an ex-serving member, it was drilled into me that every returned item was to be stripped, cleaned, lubricated and reassembled prior to handing back. Even unused clean things received the same treatment. I believe this was always to ensure that soldiers never had that rare commodity called ‘spare time’ where they might get up to devious behaviour, like relaxing, or worse still, thinking.

    So my question to the entire audience is: why is it that the majority of collectors, that I’ve come across, are immune to the concept of preventative maintenance?

    The thought of not pulling a rifle (or any mechanical artefact) apart on receipt, stripping to base workshop level and cleaning, inspecting, lubricating and reassembly is quite foreign to me. It’s an essential element of understanding the artefact you have and the condition it’s in. As a collector, it’s a requirement to properly preserve the artefact in a suitable and sustainable condition. The belief that evidence of some ‘cosmolineicon’ on the artefact means the whole steel assembly is consistently covered, protected and in good order is quite at odds to reality, to me.

    The statement that “…that’s a nice patina…” always irks me to no end. That patina is simply the product of rust, which is a chemical degradation of steel back to its constituent elements. In other words, patina is a sign of loss of material and degradation of the artefact in front of your eyes. No museum accepts unchecked rust on an artefact, as they know well that rust never sleeps and will destroy the artefact in time.

    I’m not suggesting that an aged artefact, say an 1882 Martini-Henry rifle, with signs of localised rust attack should be bead blasted, polished and reblued. Not at all. I’m suggesting that for artefact preservation, all active rust needs to be passivated and/or removed, to ensure no further destruction of the artefact occurs from rust. The preservation of the original condition, and removal of degrading or destructive corrosion seems to me, to be a self-evident requirement.

    Let me know your thoughts I really am curious to understand why some people seem to think that evidence of progressive deterioration is attractive and do not wish to prevent further loss of the original artefact.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Trying to save Service history, one rifle at a time...

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to 22SqnRAE For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 08:31 AM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    6,974
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:22 PM
    There is a notion among many collectors that they are collecting "history" and to remove rust and or dirt is to remove "history" from the rifle. These collectors are very forceful in their beliefs. I frankly don't get it either but it is what it is. I look at a rifle and while I see a piece that has history, I don't have a clue what that history is other than a very basic series of assumptions based on the nation it's from, the year it was made and perhaps a few other markings. True history like paperwork which follows the item is generally quite rare and again only provides a glimpse into a short period of time for that item.

    One aspect of an items history that can be seen is whether it has been cared for or abused. I consider allowing active rust abuse and that is a bad history that won't continue in my personal care. Certain collectors no longer want my item, I could care less, there are plenty of others that do.

    I suspect some of them sit around coming up with stories about this spot of rust began at the battle of Stalingrad as there wasn't time to wipe down the rifle and a lack of lubricating oils. More than likely it's from sitting in a closet with a small leak in the plumbing that wasn't caught right away.

    Some of the worst can be found on Facebook groups who feel free to criticize anyone that doesn't adhere to their personal beliefs. I just witnessed a spell of it on a Mosin Nagant group which I always find humorous as it is one of the most common rifles out there, the vast majority have been refurbished and sitting in storage for the last 70 years.

    I want my firearms to be in the same condition they would be in the care of the soldier, clean, functioning and rust free.

  5. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Aragorn243 For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #3
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:16 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,838
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:22 AM
    I knew a man years ago that collected Winchester rifles of all calibers and years of manufacture. He had a Kennedy repeating rifle, somewhat scarce...and he was adamant that he didn't clean his rifles, that was just taking away from them over time.

    I on the other hand strip mine and completely examine and clean them. Any rust found will be removed. Not abusively, carefully and like it was my service rifle...and my life still depended on it.
    Regards, Jim

  8. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  9. #4
    Legacy Member GeeRam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    03-18-2024 @ 03:21 PM
    Location
    Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    853
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by 22SqnRAE View Post
    What strikes me as confusing, is the common condition of almost every artefact I’ve bought from another collector. They’re dirty. Filthy in some cases and certainly questionable as to their serviceability. Caked in old grease, crud, dirt, mank, grub, goo, unidentified stains etc… Certainly not the condition that a soldier would present the said item to the staff at the Armoury or Q Store on return.
    That's because most collectors are not shooters, or ex-services. They are obsessed by originality (falsely in most cases) at all costs.
    Go and have look on the K98icon forum and you'll see they pretty much never shoot these 'collector' rifles. My Lee-Enfield No.4T came from a collector, who never fired it, although it wasn't dirty or caked in cosmo or anything.
    Back in the 1990's a guy I knew had a massive collection of WW2 Britishicon uniforms, equipment and several vehicles, including a Daimler Dingo, and a Universal Carrier. The 'carrier' was very original, but it never ran right or would break-down frequently large because a lot of the flathead ignition was old ex-mil stock and parts, and despite plenty of new made flathead V8 parts available, he would simply not fit any of these parts to make the carrier a better runner, as it would not then be 'original'.

    While its great to collect and preserve...............its better to collect, preserve, maintain as it was designed and of course......use.

  10. Thank You to GeeRam For This Useful Post:


  11. #5
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 PM
    But, in my opinion, one also needs to avoid what I call the "tarted up look" and others may call the "civi refurb look". In other words cleaning and refinishing an item to a standard that would never have happened when it left the factory or when it was in service.


    In the late 1940's, shortly after WW2, my father was given, by an ex Britishicon soldier, some Germanicon army badges and insignia some of which was new and some used. Among the items were tunic epaulets some new, some used. One of the used epaulets had what may have been dried blood on it and therefore my father washed it after receiving it. Should he have washed it? My father did and I probably would have too but some collectors probably would not have.
    Last edited by Flying10uk; 12-01-2019 at 10:08 AM.

  12. #6
    Contributing Member Sarge1998's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last On
    03-13-2024 @ 08:13 PM
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    577
    Real Name
    Joseph Budde
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 PM
    As example I have (7) M1icon Garand's in my possession that I check every winter for corrosion and run a wet patch of CLP down the bore, they are all in shooting condition and will remain that way until the next person begins to care for them.

  13. #7
    Legacy Member Scout Sniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Last On
    12-11-2023 @ 05:45 PM
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    232
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 PM
    I too strip, clean and inspect all items upon arrival before allowing them to be placed in my collection.
    If i can improve it without comprising the original integrity of the item then i will.

    And as long as it's done correctly and properly I'm all for it, I will always research a project throughly before I commit to anything major.

    I also agree all corrosion should be addressed and preservation is more important than dirty history. See quite a few No4 rifles with gunk and cosmolineicon all over them and it looks terrible like it's not maintained.

    Forgotten Weapons had a No.4(T) on an episode and spent the whole video thinking about how I would clean it. Yuk, sort it out!

  14. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Scout Sniper For This Useful Post:


  15. #8
    Contributing Member 303 Gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:20 PM
    Location
    Maine, United States
    Age
    34
    Posts
    181
    Real Name
    Joshua
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:22 PM
    Ah, those people are a particular sore spot. I find the notion that this kind of neglect is permissible to be abhorrent.

    Previous owner neglect of maintenance is a source of never ending frustration. I have ended up with several items which were left unmaintained in the name of being original. Nothing is more aggravating than taking the woodwork off a new acquisition and discovering numerous active rust spots. Especially when the former owner turns around, horrified, and accuses you of risking a valuable artifact because he didn’t see fit to take the wood off for *the 25 years he owned it* because he didn’t want to lessen its “history”. That attitude is selfish, and if left unchecked would lead to a dearth of historic rifles within a few decades. Unmaintained steel inevitably rusts.

    In short, I’m glad to see I’m not alone in these feelings.
    Last edited by 303 Gunner; 12-01-2019 at 06:48 PM.

  16. Thank You to 303 Gunner For This Useful Post:


  17. #9
    Contributing Member mrclark303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 11:11 AM
    Location
    The wild west of England
    Posts
    3,401
    Real Name
    Mr Clark
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:22 PM
    I mainly collect Milsurps firearms, I too always strip, study, carefully clean and lubricate them.

    That way you conserve these pieces and develop a deeper understanding of them.

    My recently arrived M1A1icon Cabine was absolutely filthy, it took the by part of a week to deep clean and properly conserve it.

    By way of example, the woodwork was black with filth and clogged and choked by layers of hard boiled linseed oilicon.

    It took carfully applied red scotchbrite
    (totally non destructive) and warm water to remove all this rubbish, free up the grain and let the American Walnut finally breathe again, this was followed by a full half bottle of Raw linseed oilicon.

    The transformation is astonishing, the wood comes back to life and you can see the full beauty of it.

    I completely disagree with those who would leave such as piece as is.

  18. Thank You to mrclark303 For This Useful Post:


  19. #10
    Legacy Member Scout Sniper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Last On
    12-11-2023 @ 05:45 PM
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    232
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 PM
    I can honestly say I'm surprised to see more in favour of clean and maintain than to preserve the dirt.

    On the flip I have seen No4 rifles with a super high gloss varnish finish. You ruined it!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Collecting and shooting Milsurps on the cheap
    By Eaglelord17 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-26-2015, 04:39 PM
  2. M1 Carbine Field Maintenance
    By JOHN42768 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-23-2012, 08:57 PM
  3. Scheduled Site Maintenance !
    By Badger in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-10-2010, 05:26 PM
  4. LE No4 magazine maintenance and repair
    By Boom-Boom in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-10-2010, 10:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks