+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 1943 No1 mk3* Lithgow SMLE have some questions

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Meshuggah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Last On
    01-14-2015 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Northern Kentucky
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:22 AM

    1943 No1 mk3* Lithgow SMLE have some questions

    Hello again.

    Like I stated in my long branch post, this is one of my first two enfields. Purchased at the same time. I am very new to these rifles and learned a lot in my other post. So lets see if I can get some similar help here.

    This Lithgowicon has definitely seen some use. Im not sure how original this one is so I welcome your opinions.

    The numbers (or lack there of) do not match. The receiver number does not match the number on the rear sight or the butt. The mag, bolt, and bayo boss (correct term?) look to have had their numbers scrubbed. The butt says R MA 6/47 so is it safe to say the parts were scrubbed then as well as adding the butt?

    I was so attracted to this rifle because of all the brass and the number of markings on the butt.
    Butt markings are as follows:
    C.M.F.
    2.M.D.
    The A.C. and the 'roo in a shield above III.
    HV
    R MA 6/47
    ...and this must be the original serial and date of the butt.
    41952
    8/16

    The butt also has an H on the top under the cocking piece. Does that denote heavy? sniper butt? Was the rifle in the CMF or just the butt?

    The barrel is also marked with 6 '47. The rear sight guard is marked MA '42.

    There also lots of different letter marked pieces. I think I got them all in the pics. Were these all from just a heavy refurb in 1947 or did someone piece it together? The aussie marks are MA and OA right?

    It also looked to be a rifle that was dipped in yellow paint but someone removed it at one point. Theres still specks of it here and there, especially when you disassemble the front end. The dipping in paint was to easily clarify between calibers correct?

    This rifle came with a charger clip loaded with 1919 head stamped ammo as well.

    Anybody have any insight for me regarding this rifle, markings, or questions?

    Thanks in advance!
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member Aussie48's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last On
    04-12-2020 @ 06:16 PM
    Location
    The Land Down Under, Australia
    Posts
    366
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 PM
    So many questions, here are a few answers:

    I would say it is a parts gun see the JJCO NY on the side of the receiver, they brought up huge stocks from Australiaicon and either sold as was (usually war stores) or made up rifles from parts.

    CMF was Citizens Military Forces
    2MD is New South Wales
    MA Lithgow, OA Orange, BA Bathurst all dinky die
    Barrel is a 47
    Receiver is a 43
    It could of course be an FTR in 1947 and then issued to the CMF in 2MD who knows now.
    1MD = Queensland, 2MD= New South Wales, 3MD= Victoria, 4MD= South Australia, 5MD = Western Australia, 6MD = Tasmania and 7MD = Northern Territory. So if you enlisted in the Army in say Tasmania after WW2 you Regimental Number would have 6 as the first number pre WW@ it would have the prefix TX.

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Aussie48 For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member Aussie48's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last On
    04-12-2020 @ 06:16 PM
    Location
    The Land Down Under, Australia
    Posts
    366
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 PM
    An update,

    Yellow denotes the rifle was safe to fire but not up to military standards, usually found on CMF and Cadet rifles. The serial number on the but if correct makes it a pre 1918, don't know where that came from, old stocks at Lithgowicon during the FTR?
    R MA 47 FTR date at Lithgow.
    HV set up for MKVII ammunition.
    That's me finished I'm sure some of the more knowledgeable Aussie members can fill in better than I have.

  7. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-13-2024 @ 05:00 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    09:22 AM
    While I was in Australiaicon, the yellow bands indicated a DP rifle......... Rifles left plain/service were the rifles used for live firing

  8. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Meshuggah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Last On
    01-14-2015 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Northern Kentucky
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Hmm..

    Is there a difference between "not up to military standards" and "drill purpose only/not for live fire"?

    Wouldn't there be markings on the rifle denoting that it was DP?

    If the rifle is DP or not safe for live fire, then was somebody trying to hide that fact by removing the yellow paint? Does not look recent nor did they do a good job.

    I'll be bummed if the rifle is unsafe for shooting...

  9. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-13-2024 @ 05:00 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    09:22 AM
    To save going through all of the DP threads again I suggest that you take a couple of hours to look some of the relevant threads up. It's not unknown - or beynd the wit of man - to disguise a DP rifle as something better.

  10. #7
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    02:22 AM
    There have been posts suggesting the yellow paint indicates use by cadets? with some possible minor mechanical issue but safe to fire? I have a '44 that shows traces of it that is virtually brand new in most respects but has a restamped bolt that gave the previous owner trouble. The bore, in particular, is among my best and, with bolt issues sorted, it's a very accurate rifle. Like Mr. Laidlericon says, have a good look at old threads.

    Ridolpho

  11. #8
    Legacy Member Aussie48's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Last On
    04-12-2020 @ 06:16 PM
    Location
    The Land Down Under, Australia
    Posts
    366
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 PM
    Rifles issued to Cadet Units in Australiaicon had 3 colour Codes:

    Green = Safe to fire up to Service Standard,

    Yellow = Safe to fire not up to Service Standard, and

    Red = Not To Be Fired DP Only.

    From memory the RED painted rifles were rendered innocuous for obvious reasons.

    While I was in the Regular Army I never saw any Regular Army issued weapon with any paint on it. Perhaps and PL would know it was a RAEME Repair marking, but they were never issued out to us (what would be the point). When Cadets changed to the L1A1 they were all serviceable shooters (Yellow) that I am aware of.

  12. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Aussie48 For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Legacy Member Homer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    04-17-2024 @ 12:07 AM
    Posts
    658
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 PM
    I don't see anything here that gives this rifle away as being a parts gun. Yes the R over MA over the date on the butt indicates a refurb and the lack of serial numbers is normal for a rifle refurbed at this time, although the bolt would have been numbered to the action in service. Forends, barrels, sights and nosecaps were mostly not numbered on these 46/47 refurbs and Lithgowicon never numbered magazines. Mismatched rear sights just means its reused and perfectly normal for a refurb. The butt is mismatched because it is also a reused part and all the detail and numbers are off the previous rifle that was converted to H pattern during the 30's most likely. As said previously, the yellow paint indicates cadet rifle. Shame its been removed but no big deal. Put it back on and restore it to cadet rifle if it bothers you.

  14. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Meshuggah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Last On
    01-14-2015 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Northern Kentucky
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Ok...

    So I've been reading for a couple hours. There seems to be no definitive answer about what the yellow paint 100% means.

    So yes a cadet rifle... Does that mean it was DP or EY? From what I read, no. I also read that the paint could have been applied to denote a rusted or pitted barrel. This barrel is pitted. The barrel mark is 5 '47 and the butt refurb number is 6/47. Does that make sense?
    I couldn't find any clarity on this but, was the paint added at the repair depot when refurbing? Or did they paint them elsewhere/at other times?

    I also read here that yellow meant "safe for live fire with occasional ball ammo". What exactly does that mean?


    The crown passes the bullet test but I still need to get the head space checked. If the headspace is good I think it will be safe to shoot.

    Adding the paint to restore it is a cool idea...


    I also am thinking like Homer. I think it is in the same shape it was in from the refurb in 47 minus the paint.

    I am assuming the DP rifles are worth much less than a non yellowed rifle. Probably why someone removed it at one point?
    Last edited by Meshuggah; 01-07-2015 at 11:20 AM. Reason: Spelling

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Lithgow SMLE 41 and 44 - need some help
    By ab212amisar in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-03-2013, 11:48 AM
  2. Markings on 1943 Lithgow SMLE
    By Stumblebum in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 08-03-2013, 10:36 PM
  3. Lithgow 1943
    By mrkurtz in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-29-2012, 11:15 PM
  4. 1943 Lithgow.
    By Anzac15 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-19-2011, 11:27 PM
  5. Lithgow SMLE .22
    By A6BN in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-30-2010, 02:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts