+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Eddystone manufacturing methods

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:22 AM

    Eddystone manufacturing methods

    These are old posts I 'saved' that are worth re-posting:
    (Not sure who the author(s) is/were unfortunately.)
    Low Serial number Eddystone-Any Problems???

    Guys there is more to the cracked receiver problems than identified above. I used to work in the US Army Small Cal. Weapons Lab, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ and worked with a guy that used to rent a room from a guy that was third shift plant foreman at Eddystone. He related that there was no heat treating expertise for lack of a better description in those days. The guys in the forge room judged the correct heat by "looking" at the steel billets in the gas furnace.

    That is the good news guys. Now here is some of the bad news. The guys in the forge room were paid piece rate, i.e. the more you do the more you make. Well they were supposed to heat the billets to between red and bright red and pull them out with the tongs and place them the trip hammers. Three hits first position, two hits the second position and one hit the third position.

    Well the good ole boys in the forge room found that if they turned the furnace up a bit more and took the billets to white hot they could stamp the billet one time in the last position, turn out more forgings, make more money and ............... well you know the rest.

    Only problem is when they went to white the steel was burned and the granular structure was not rearranged correctly to give it maximum strength. This supervisor was continually having to go in and turn the furnace down on the third shift so no telling how many thousand they made.

    I am also in possession of declassified Britishicon Ordnance notes from WW1 and I have a set of Remington receiver drawings for the Pattern 14. For you technical types the material callout on the bolt is for 3% nickel steel on the bolt and 3 1/2% nickel steel for the receiver. No heat treat callouts are listed. The bolt drawing number is RE-B-10 and the receiver drawings (called the "body" )is RE-B-8

    There are numerous revisions (as the war progressed) relaxing tolerances here and there.

    The declassified reports from the War Production Board identify a fairly large number of catastrophic failures in the barrels from all three manufacturers. Basically if you read what I have read you would be very leary of ever firing one of these. To give any doubting Thomases a better vision of what happens read on.
    Seems the barrels ( all manufacturers) wanted to split starting at the muzzle and worked their way towards the receiver.

    Apparently the barrel life was only expected to be 6000 rounds as that is as far as they were QA tested.

    There is page after page of QA problems identfied from all vendors. From the notes their Ordnance Board wanted to cancel the contracts and the onsite Brit Army QA guys were inspecting to SMLE standards and rejecting (if memory serves me) a very large percentage of the rifles. The only reason they did not cancel the contract was they were afraid the US would get offended if US vendors were rejected and they wanted us in the war so they took them till we entered and then production shifted to 30.06 for us. There is no reason to assume anything changed when the customer changed.

    Contrary to popular belief the guys that work in the arsenals are not direct blood descendents of John Browning, John Garandicon, or anyone else that ever made/designed a gun. Most of the guys in the arsenals (including guys I talked to at Colt, Smith & Wesson years ago) did not even know what they were making, they were just shown a job grinding, polishing this or that and they had to make so many to get so much money and anything they can get out the door is money in their pocket. My friend told me they drained the Water Shops pond at Springfield Armory years ago and found over 500 receivers in the mud that were screwed up during production and thrown out the window.
    __________________________________________________ ____________________________
    As indicated above it is best to relieve the built up stresses by cutting a groove in front of the receiver on this design prior to barrel removal.
    Under no circumstances are gov't 03/l917/P14 barrels to be rechambered for magnum calibers. That is unless you want to lose your fingers when the barrel fails. Barrels tend to fail at the 3 and 9 o'clock orientation. Occasionally one will fail in the 12/6 o'clock orientation. Imagine this!!!!

    I have seen cracked receivers upon rebarreling. Some machinists want to force receivers onto threads. Best to be able to hand screw the action all the way onto the threads to relieve any internal radial stresses from oversize threads.

    I have some P14 actions and l917 actions and the barrels have come off everything after stress relieving by cutting slot in front of receiver. The actions I prefer are Rem and Win. but also have some Eddystones. Haven't seen any problems yet but then again no longer do them up in magnums (after I read the reports).
    Also be advised there were two diameter strikers used in l917s. Both sizes were issued in Armorer Field kits as replacements. All the P14s are the small diameter. I chuck them up, drill them out and replace with l917 strikers with very small clearance. Generally .001" larger diameter than the striker nose when possible. I have seen P14 with excessive striker protrusion as well and have seen several pierced primers.

    The good news is l917 strikers are perfect replacement extractors for the pre 64 Model 70 Winchester. They just have to be fitted.
    __________________________________________________ ____________________________

    The Eddystone heat treat process was sometimes not very carefully done, and some of the receivers are too hard. When the barrel was installed, and tightened excessively, as was supposedly the case, the receivers sometimes developed small cracks.

    When the sporterizing of military rifles was common after WWII, this cracking was usually discovered at the time of rebarreling, and the cause was attributed to the working of the metal as the rebarreling was being done.

    Many gunsmiths refused to work on Eddystone manufactured rifles, although there seems to be no record of catastrophic failures, as there was with the low numbered Springfield and Rock Island 03s.

    Crack detection is common in the automotive engine rebuild industry, and I suspect that any engine shop with magnaflux or one of the other crack detection processes could perform it on your rifle, and I believe the expense is not great.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:22 PM
    Might also be a useful post in the Milsurps gunsmithing forum!

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 11:33 AM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,152
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    i have a few issues with this...
    1917 receivers are 3% nickle steel and only surface hardened...
    Winchester M 70 extractors or a bit too short to work on a 17 or P14.
    and have a step in them like a Mauser.
    at least 60ft pounds is needed to secure a crush fit with a square threaded barrel.
    no more then 85lBS should be used.
    avoid cutting the barrel ahead of the should for a relief cut..it will ruin said barrel.
    only as a last chance should this be used...use the right tools and you get the job done..
    iv yet to see a 1917 receiver from any maker with original barrel, with a cracked ring, and i see more then most.
    if you eat your wheaties, you should be able to remove a 17 barrel,,man up and pull!!!
    interesting post....thanks for sharing.

  7. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    shjoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-31-2011 @ 06:54 AM
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    46
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:22 PM
    chuck: that dosent seem like alot of torque. heck, you need 70-90 ft/lbes to tighten the wheels on your car. thats about the max from a standard length 1/2" drive ratchet. however, after a while, the release torque required may be greatly in excess of that. very interesting topic and discussion. i have never attempted to remove an M1917 barrel and i am not disputing your data (you have more experience in this than i), just seemed like not alot of fastening torque. the thread crush would certainly prevent the barrel from loosening on its own. lately, i have only been considering M1917s which have their original barrels installed due to a chance of buying one with a replacement barrel, but a possible cracked receiver. as you mention, with properly fitting adapters and tools, it shouldnt be that difficult to remove an M1917 barrel, safely. best, john

  8. #5
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Just remembered that I saw a P14 with the original barrel split at 9 and 3 o'clock recently. I'll have to take another look at it and repost. Personally I wouldn't be afraid to shoot mine though and they have been converted to the largest magnums without failures that I have heard of...

  9. #6
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 11:33 AM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,152
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    heres a visual.
    i have a 17 barreled receiver in my 50lb receiver wrench, the handle of said wrench is in my early 1900s vintage blacksmith vise, thats attached to a home made bench out of 1/2 aromor plate 300 lbs,
    i have a 26 inch pipe wrench attached to the old crusty barrel just ahead of the receiver, and a 5 foot cheater pipe over that.
    i have my 225 lbs butt hanging off said pipe, and give it a pull.
    POW! it comes loose, i roll around on the floor, get up and unscrew the rusted POS of a barrel..
    most 17,s come loose pretty basic, but some just wont give it up.
    thats why most guys wont work on them.
    look at it this way.
    they make a real cool wrench to tighten and remove your lug nuts, and those are sharp edged threads, they are made to come on and off time and time again.
    easy to tighten up even for a 95 lb girl on the side of the road.
    see if you can clamp down on a smooth round peice of steel, without buggering it up,
    then turn the weird shaped receiever, without ruining it as well. and make sure you get the 2 little lines exactly matched up, as the sight picture needs to be right.
    and do it with enough force to crush the shoulder {not the threads} thats what crush is.
    and make sure you dont scratch, bugger, bend. mar, crack, scuff, teek or other wise leave any marks on the reciever when your done.
    sounds pretty easy dont it.
    FYI: the wrench that the CMPicon sells, and the ones on the market have a handle thats only about 15 to 20 inches long, and iv pulled the handles off both.
    so i made my own.
    the handle on mine is 36 inches long. weighs ove 50 pounds, and likely the handle will never pull off.
    sounds easy to get 50 to 75 ft pounds to shoulder crush ,, dont it.
    look at a pulled barrel from a 17. 1903 or Garandicon, youll see the crush in talking about.

  10. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    shjoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-31-2011 @ 06:54 AM
    Location
    Mass
    Posts
    46
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:22 PM
    good discription, chuck. thanks for taking the time to explain it. it seems that the real tension on the receiver/barrel assembly would be the force to upset the crush area. far in excess of the 70-90ft/lbes clamping torque. nicely put, thanks. best,john

  11. #8
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Some info never goes out of fashion, and I just happened to come across this thread again.

    Now I know why the UKicon laid aside 10,000 Winchester P14s for possible future sniper conversions, rather than 10,000 Eddystones or Remingtons, despite the fact that the A.E.F. in 1918 said "send no more Winchester M17s to Franceicon" due to non-standard parts.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  12. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    10-29-2023 @ 04:38 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,021
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:22 PM
    There seems to a merging several different stories involving the Springfield Armory (the original) with Eddystone. The heat treating problem was more academic to the Springfield armory than the Eddystone plant. Eyeballing the color of the steel was a time honored way to determine the heat treating of the steel. As the WWI progressed men were drafted, enlisted or called to active duty and a shortage of very skilled workers greatly affected the ordnance industries in the US. There was always a acute shortage of workers at Eddystome as the turn over was quite high. Often from workers moving around looking for better pay as there was a critical shortage of manpower as the US geared up for the fighting. Winchester was the only company to solve this problem by bring back retirees and hiring women into their work force to fill in the gaps.

    I have to agree with Chuck I believe most of the problems with the cracking of the Eddystone receivers was from the use of improper tools and inexperience workmen changing the barrels especially during the WWII rebuild programs.

    The Eddystone plant was probably the best run rifle factory in the US as it was set up by Colonel John T. Thompson after his retirement from the US Ordnance department. As the US entered WWI, Colonel Thompson was recalled to active duty promoted to Brigadier General and ran the Rifle Board between the three manufacturers of the "Model of 1917" rifle. Commonality of parts between the three manufacturers was the driving force in the production of the M1917. and in the long run better production numbers were achieved. Winchester jumped the gun and produced early rifles that were not according to specification. General Pershing insisted on compatibility of the M1917 and directed that no Winchesters be shipped to AEF unless that were compatible with Remington and Eddystone. Both of whom waited until the specifications for the M1917 rifle were published by the US Army Ordnance Department.
    Last edited by fjruple; 10-08-2018 at 08:45 PM.

  14. #10
    Legacy Member RC20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 09:20 PM
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    316
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:22 AM
    Lets see, I knew a guy who knew a guy who new a guy that was on the far side of the moon who knew a guy that was in Triton who knew this guy who was on the 4th shift who knew a buy in the first shift and they were paid by the piece.

    Real evidence would start with how workers were paid.

    Something like 3 million rifles built and lord knows how many modified and the cracks are direly related to the wrong tools used in remove a barrel (that is from Chuck in Denver who has done hundreds of barrel changes on a 1917 of ALL makes )

    Now that you can take to the bank.

  15. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to RC20 For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Primer manufacturing- Why not ?
    By Fick_2141 in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-22-2009, 01:48 PM
  2. Removing rear handguards - two methods
    By Bob Womack in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-25-2009, 06:15 PM
  3. German manufacturing codes
    By hunderi in forum Book and Video Review Corner
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 04:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks