+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: not intended to **** off any krag lovers but

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Pelago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-20-2010 @ 11:31 AM
    Location
    rural NC
    Posts
    107
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 AM

    not intended to **** off any krag lovers but

    why was the krag adopted, if i read my history right the best rifle at the time was the mauser. and it shot a better bullet, so why did the us adopt a (imho) 2nd best rifle
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:11 AM
    Or the Remington Lee, with or w/o a mag cutoff? And No foreign patent fights!

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    OrderlySgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-31-2017 @ 10:03 PM
    Posts
    8
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:11 AM
    Likely the same reason they left all the Lewis guns in the US and used that Frenchicon POS excuse for a machine gun in WWI?

  6. #4
    Legacy Member kragluver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    09-25-2022 @ 09:07 PM
    Location
    Aledo, Texas
    Age
    57
    Posts
    106
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 AM
    At the time the Kragicon was adopted (1892), it was not yet clear that the Mauser was the best bolt action design. Remember, in the early 1890s, all bolt action designs were brand new and there was not yet a need to push chamber pressures above 40KSI. The Army still put a lot of weight on the ability to single load the rifle and the concept was to utilize the magazine in reserve. This coupled with the fact that the Krag magazine could be topped off with a round in the chamber (which the Mauser could not) helped win the day for the Krag. Also, the Mauser as tested (circa 1892) did not perform as well in the various durability and reliability tests as the Krag. Incidentally, the Lee Enfield performed well in those same tests and if you read between the lines of the reports, most likely placed second in the magazine rifle trials. However, Lee had got cross-ways politically with the powers that be at US Ordnance and there was no way "his" rifle design would win The Krag was a good and functional design - is the Mauser better? Yes, but that wasn't so apparent in 1892.

  7. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to kragluver For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jeff L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last On
    06-22-2014 @ 04:10 PM
    Posts
    208
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:11 AM
    My understanding is that the brass didn't want troops to waste ammo with new bolt action rifles. Then they had to fight in Cuba against troops armed with Mausers and reconsidered. Thus the 1903 was developed.

    -Jeff L

  9. #6
    Legacy Member charles isaac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-29-2024 @ 03:56 PM
    Posts
    34
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:11 AM
    Kragluver is on it and could probably write a short novel on the subject. I'll help out and add some.

    There are a lot of factors you have to take into account such as the experiences and thinking of the men responsible for choosing the new rifle.

    Small arms technology was traveling at a speed unequaled at any other time in history.

    In a 40 year time span, the US went from smooth bore muskets, to rifled muskets, then the breech loader and finally the smokeless repeater. 40 years ago we were using the same rifle we are using today!

    Some noteworthy points:

    The Chief of Ordnance was a Civil War Veteran.

    The Kragicon literally blew away the Mauser in the dirt tests-only wiping action of the Soldiers hand was permitted to clear the fouled weapon.

    The Ordnance Corps specified rimmed cartridges. The Mauser did not work well with them.

    The ability to have the weapon ready to fire while reloading was preferred-still is today.

    Ability to fire as a single loader. The Krag has a machined tray above the magazine that made it superior for this.

    I do not agree with all of this, but it was the thinking of the day.

    If you ever get a chance to see "The History of the Gun", Ian Hogg spends a lot of time railing against the Krag, as if trying to ensure future generations will view the Krag as a complete and utter failure on the part of the Americans for being an inferior design and how we learned our lesson against the Spanish that were armed with 7mm Mausers, culminating in us copying the Mauser.

    Ian fails to mention:
    1. The Krag was invented by Europeans.
    2.The Lee adopted by the English was invented by an American.
    3. The first models of Enfields the English used had a magazine cutoff AND-
    4. No provision for clip loading!
    5. The English learned their lesson against the Boers armed with 7mm Mausers.
    6. The English attempted to adopt a Mauser, in 7mm even, sometime after learning their lesson against the Boers. WWI stopped the project and the Americans produced the rifle for them in .303.

    Hope this helps

  10. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to charles isaac For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Pelago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-20-2010 @ 11:31 AM
    Location
    rural NC
    Posts
    107
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 AM
    Thread Starter
    i have heard people say that the average enlisted man could not be trusted with a rifle that he could fire five times without reloading

    don't know who said it, but since they were using napoleonic methods in wwI sounds right

  12. #8
    Legacy Member jon_norstog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    11-01-2021 @ 12:41 AM
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    582
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:11 AM

    or the Lee...

    Quote Originally Posted by jmoore View Post
    Or the Remington Lee, with or w/o a mag cutoff? And No foreign patent fights!

    I've used the Remington Lee quite a bit and can say it is a weapon with many fine points. But having used the Kragicon and the Remingon-Lee, I would take the Krag any day in any situation involving the use of small arms.

    The Lee's faults are (worst) an unreliable extractor/ejector, its half-cock bolt plunger safety, and a bolt assembly with tiny parts easy to lose in the field. Its strengths are its extremely strong action, detachable box magazine and light weight.

    I could have taken the Lee hunting anytime, and have always taken the Krag instead, even though it weighs a pound ANd a half more, and I won't load it up the way I can with the Lee.

    Try both rifles. You'll see what I mean.

    jn

  13. Thank You to jon_norstog For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Legacy Member jon_norstog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    11-01-2021 @ 12:41 AM
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    582
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:11 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by jmoore View Post
    Or the Remington Lee, with or w/o a mag cutoff? And No foreign patent fights!

    I've used the Remington Lee quite a bit and can say it is a weapon with many fine points. But having used the Kragicon and the Remingon-Lee, I would take the Krag any day in any situation involving the use of small arms.

    The Lee's faults are (worst) an unreliable extractor/ejector, its half-cock bolt plunger safety, and a bolt assembly with tiny parts easy to lose in the field. Its strengths are its extremely strong action, detachable box magazine and light weight.

    I could have taken the Lee hunting anytime, and have always taken the Krag instead, even though it weighs a pound ANd a half more, and I won't load it up the way I can with the Lee.

    Try both rifles. You'll see what I mean.

    jn

  15. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    tbeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    08-22-2011 @ 12:02 PM
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:11 AM
    Jon, I think you are on to something. I have only shot the 45-70 Lees, but their action feels like stirring a bucket of bolts next to a Kragicon. Keep in mind, the ordnance folks were all denizens of the target range and prized slick, accurate rifles above fast loading, fast shooting rifles.

    I read once that the Germans produced the best hunting rifles (Mauser), The Americans produced the best target rifles (Krag and '03) and the Brits produced the best battle rifles (Lee).

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. krag help
    By ivanho01 in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-27-2009, 07:29 PM
  2. Tell Me about my New Krag...
    By dpatten in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-22-2009, 11:34 PM
  3. krag photo
    By goo in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-15-2009, 10:25 AM
  4. Help with new krag
    By nc_leatherneck in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-17-2009, 05:06 PM
  5. Bubba's Krag
    By colwhelen in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 01:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks