+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: What is the difference between a MkIII* and a MkIII?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    EnfieldNutt84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    09-07-2010 @ 03:26 AM
    Posts
    102
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    11:38 AM

    What is the difference between a MkIII* and a MkIII?

    I just picked up a barreled receiver, it is a pre-WW1 "No1MkIII* FR 47" retaining it's magazine cut-off but with updated charger bridge, I am curious what the star (*) significance is. Honestly on the rebuild I'd rather clad it as a Mk1No1, the looks of the MkI I much prefer and can barely find a single one in the states. Would the * indicate the updated Charger Bidge? With the FR in 47, maybe was a MkI which was updated into a MKIII? Thanks in advance.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 10:56 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:38 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by EnfieldNutt84 View Post
    I just picked up a barreled receiver, it is a pre-WW1 "No1MkIII* FR 47" retaining it's magazine cut-off but with updated charger bridge, I am curious what the star (*) significance is. Honestly on the rebuild I'd rather clad it as a Mk1No1, the looks of the MkI I much prefer and can barely find a single one in the states. Would the * indicate the updated Charger Bidge? With the FR in 47, maybe was a MkI which was updated into a MKIII? Thanks in advance.
    Hope this helps :

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Deceased January 15th, 2016 Beerhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    01-02-2016 @ 04:03 PM
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    1,181
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:38 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by EnfieldNutt84 View Post
    With the FR in 47, maybe was a MkI which was updated into a MKIII? Thanks in advance.
    I can't think why that should be the case.

    It sounds as though it is a between the wars No1 Mk.III* that was Factory (Thorough) Repaired in India in 1947 - look for the "Ishy Screw".

    So to be honest it should be rebuilt as a No1 Mk.III* with cut-off.

  7. #4
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 10:56 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:38 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Beerhunter View Post
    look for the "Ishy Screw".
    It was a 'barreled action' so the ishy screw wont be there.

    Here is a pic of my (originally a Lithgowicon) No1 Mk3* that was Ishapore FR'd and scrubbed in '46
    Is the 'font' on yours similar ?


  8. #5
    Deceased January 15th, 2016 Beerhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    01-02-2016 @ 04:03 PM
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    1,181
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:38 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan de Enfield View Post
    It was a 'barreled action' so the ishy screw wont be there.
    Oops. My brain must have thought that it was Monday morning.

  9. #6
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 09:09 PM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    3,279
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:38 PM
    EnfieldNutt84,

    Can you post some pics or the date of the rifle, Although its designated as a No1 Mk111*, (this doesnt always mean you get what it says on the tin)

    If you look at at Alan,s post it says, "may embody any of the following modifications"

    These mods didn,t takeplace overnight so a lot of rifles would still be found with some of the features.

  10. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    bradtx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    11-29-2010 @ 08:01 AM
    Location
    Pearland, TX
    Posts
    302
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:38 AM
    EnfieldNutt84, There are two variations of the Mk.III that may become confusing. The WWI version with fore ends milled for the volly sights and other items in Alan's list and the interwar version where only the magazine cut off was employed. While the action bodies are available in two styles, milled for the cut off (MK.III) and those that weren't (MK.III*), some Mk.III action bodies were originally assembled as Mk.III*, then when FTR'd a cut off was installed and the * lined out.

    Brad

  11. #8
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 10:56 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:38 PM
    Just found this old post by someone called Peter Laidlericon - it was a few years ago on the Joustericon forum :

    In one of the last No1 Mk3 EMER's (yes, EMER's WERE issued in respect of the No1 rifles in 1956) it 'sort of' clarified the position of whether a No1 Mk3 was a Mk3 or a 3*. It ignored the odds and sods to explain that in the interests of standardisation, that all rifles made without the provision of a cut-off would be regarded as Mk3* rifles and so far as practicably possible (lovely choice of words isn't it....) should conform to the current (presumably latest) specification.

    All rifles provisioned for (made with ...) a cut-off slot (Mk3's), where the cut-off has been removed, WILL be fitted with a fore-end that covers the otherwise open slot to prevent the ingress of foreign matter (I think they mean ****e and rubbish.....). These rifles shall be advanced to and marked Mk3*. But a rifle so advanced shall not return to its former status for any reason. Where practicable, these rifles should conform to the current specification.

    I take this to read this:
    that a Mk3* rifle remains a Mk3* for ever and always regardless of the different this that and the other that it's fitted with.
    a Mk3 rifle that has had the cut-off removed in the past will be fitted with a high sided fore-end and THEN be advanced to and marked Mk3* regardless of the fact that it still has a cut-off slot albeit under the wood. BUT thereafter it can NEVER revert to low wood and its old Mk3 spec.

    Is that as clear as mud? Luckily we didn't have too many No1 rifles except for the hundreds of EY's and those with the Cadet Forces.

    This probably explains why some rifles are marked Mk3* but have cut-offs and some could(?) have the little star barred out.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  12. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    GUNZABLAZIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    01-19-2024 @ 10:36 AM
    Location
    Ft.Wayne,Indiana
    Posts
    8
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    10:38 AM
    Here is a picture of my 1918 Ishapore No. 1 MkIII with the * lined out.



    RIF in 1928



    Magazine cutoff reinstalled, no Ishy screw, no import marks


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. My MKIII
    By patriot76 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 05:44 PM
  2. My MKIII
    By patriot76 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 11:09 AM
  3. $9.59 No1 MKIII
    By wallyss in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-07-2010, 02:25 PM
  4. What can you tell me about this No1 MkIII?
    By Baal in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-19-2009, 02:53 AM
  5. No1 MkIII Questions
    By TerryChambers in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-15-2009, 11:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks