+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Question on early No. 4 "T" Enfield conversions accuracy.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member rayg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 08:57 AM
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,053
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    02:29 AM

    Question on early No. 4 "T" Enfield conversions accuracy.

    I know the Trials rifles, and a few others were converted by Enfield originally but were any accuracy acceptence tests done like had been done with the ones mfg later that were stamped TR and sent to H&H for conversion or were they just standard rifles that were in stores or off the assembly lines?
    My Trials rifle that was converted to a "T" sniper has the sniper stylized "T" stamped on the barrel under the wood by the receiver. Could that mean that in addition to the set up to sniper, mounts, cheek rest etc. that the barrel/rifle met sniper accruacy tests or had been improved to do so. Ray
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:25 PM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:29 AM

    EFD converted early T's.

    That's a very perceptive question! You know, I'd never given it any real thought.......Peter! Where are you????

    ATB

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    04:29 AM
    I don't know if they were specially selected or not, but mine is the MOST accurate No.4 Mk.1(T) of all that I have or have shot!

  6. #4
    Legacy Member rayg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 08:57 AM
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,053
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    02:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    Are you talking about the Trials one?

  7. #5
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    04:29 AM
    Yah, dot's de von!
    Last edited by jmoore; 09-01-2010 at 10:41 AM. Reason: o not a

  8. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-17-2024 @ 02:10 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,505
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    10:29 AM
    Mmmmmmmm, very perceptive question...... I don't think that they were shot for accuracy as I can't see any paperwork to suggest that they were with regards sniping. They were alrady reputed to be the most accurate rifle we'd had to that date, simple (simpler) to produce and we needed sniper rifles. There was a telescope coming on stream so the No4 it was....., albeit the initial trials rifles

  9. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Legacy Member rayg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 08:57 AM
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,053
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    02:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    I would imagine that some where along the way, they must have been test fired to meet some requirements for accuracy. I can't see that they would just convert any rifle to a sniper without some accuracy standard.
    Regarding the trials rifles, as they were made in peace time and were a trials type, there was probably greater care taken in the manufacturing/machining and accuracy requirements, don't you think? Ray

  11. #8
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,648
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Did the number of 1403 trials rifles converted to "T" specs represent a discernable scale of issue in relation to the number of battalions in existence? Or, did it represent all the trials rifles made, or only a portion of those? There are some examples known that were not converted after all.

    If it represents only part of those known to have been on hand (and presumably unissued at that date), then one might conclude that there was some form of accuracy test and that some rifles did not pass; or that the number 1403 was chosen for some specific reason related to scale of issue or...?

    It would hardly have made sense to go to the trouble of converting them and then to find out when doing the final zeroing that some would not group adequately and had to be either 'remediated' or returned to standard No4 specs.

    On the other hand, the press of work at that date may have led to there being no final zeroing tests at all and the rifles being left up to the end user to zero(?)

    Or of course, the rifles may have already been tested before the outbreak of war to a standard that was considered adequate for conversion and therefore there was no need for further testing beyond post-conversion zeroing.

    Presumably those rifles that went out on troop trials before the war were inspected and refurbished after the trials were over, and the trials probably did not include firing more than a few hundred rounds from each rifle anyway(?)

    I regret to say I never fired either of my trials "T"s so can't comment, but I recall reading that they were effectively "hand-built" rifles and naturally would have been made to as high a standard as possible in order that the design might be fairly tested without manufacturing standards affecting the results.

    Just throwing some guesses out there...
    Last edited by Surpmil; 09-11-2010 at 01:29 AM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  12. #9
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-17-2024 @ 02:10 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,505
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    10:29 AM
    Clearly they were all test fired and passed the required accuracy test prior to issue and trials otherwise there'd be no point in putting them a) through the trials and b) issuing them for extended troop trials afterwards, albeit as bog standard No4 rifles.

    Given this and the greater accuracy required of a No4 over a No1 and the simplicity of fitting up a No4 over a No3 rifle, then I'd say that it was cut and dried! Any further accuracy tests were pretty academic as they'd already been through and passed one!

    Just my thoughts, knowing how the trials teams work now and presumably used the same 'bleedin obvious' formula then.

    I've just re-read that again and I hope that it doesn't sound insulting to anyone out there in forum-land........... So please don't take it as an insult but rather a play on language!

    We have the paperwork regarding these trials. It's pretty exhaustive so I don't want to go through it all again.....................

  13. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    viking guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    12-24-2011 @ 11:15 PM
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    42
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:29 AM
    Hello Peter Laidlericon! I have found owned your books for many years and find them very informative. I enjoy my rifles more than ever, knowing they conform to the details you clearly reveal to us. What a service you have done for us collectors of these wonderful rifles. Many thanks.

    Now, on to accuracy. Mine will shoot 1-1.5moa at 100 and 200 yards with Greek HXP or Winchester white box 174gr. on my best days.

    What kind of 4 or 5shot groups is a good T capable of at 300 thru 500 yards? I assume the group sizes farther out are hampered by the low magnification of the No.32 MKII-MKIII.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. what accuracy can/may expect with a "cheap" barrel
    By AKA Hugh Uno in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-08-2009, 12:05 PM
  2. A Follow-Up to M1 Accuracy "debate" and M80 discussion below
    By AKA Hugh Uno in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-04-2009, 03:34 PM
  3. "Corrosion Under Oil Films"..cure for early '03 woes
    By MoMallard in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 09:10 AM
  4. "Early" Saginaw handguard
    By Rick the Librarian in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-04-2009, 05:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks