+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 51

Thread: Savage Lee Enfield not lend lease

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member enfield303t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    12-05-2022 @ 02:54 PM
    Location
    Okanagan BC
    Posts
    1,166
    Real Name
    Donald
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 PM

    Savage Lee Enfield not lend lease

    I have a No 4 made by Savage that is not marked US Property. It does have the "flaming bomb" mark meaning it was US Arsenaled ? How common were these guns compared to the Lend Lease guns?

    Thanks
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member tlvaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    08-13-2022 @ 05:30 PM
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    340
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:06 PM
    All of the Savage made No4 MkI's and MkI*'s were stamped "U.S. PROPERTY". I have a '41 and '42 MkI and a '42, '43 dated, '43 not dated, and '44 MkI* and they are all marked "U.S. PROPERTY". The rumor is that an officer of the Britishicon army did not like the property mark and ordered it scrubbed off. As far as how many, I'm not sure if anyone will be able to answer that.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member enfield303t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    12-05-2022 @ 02:54 PM
    Location
    Okanagan BC
    Posts
    1,166
    Real Name
    Donald
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks tlvaughn but it doesn't appear it was ever scrubbed and having the flaming bomb makes it interesting. I have been told that at some times the US used Lee Enfields as it was easier in that theatre to get .303 ammo. If that happened I know it would be very uncommon. I also have a US Property No 4 and when comparing them it is evident both are original.

    Just talked to a good friend who has countless Lee Enfields and has seen the gun. He told me my No 4 was not the first one he has seen lacking the US Property mark and having the US "flaming bomb' marking.
    Last edited by enfield303t; 09-02-2010 at 11:46 PM. Reason: Added more information
    Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?

  6. #4
    Legacy Member bearhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    11-02-2020 @ 03:00 PM
    Location
    Okanogan, BC
    Posts
    509
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:06 PM
    I know that rifle personally, and it isn't the first No4 Savage to be seen, without lend lease markings. The serial number, is in the proper range and all of the rest of the stamps, are authentic. The receiver is untouched and original. It certainly isn't a one off, although I do admit they aren't frequently encountered. It's a very clean rifle.
    I've heard a similar rumor, but was informed by a deceased friend, that was a WWII REME, that just wan't true. The rifle, came from "Tiny" Tim Ryan's estate and Wheaty can vouch for the validity of his credentials.
    Last edited by bearhunter; 09-03-2010 at 12:05 AM.

  7. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to bearhunter For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Legacy Member tlvaughn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    08-13-2022 @ 05:30 PM
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    340
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:06 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by bearhunter View Post
    The serial number, is in the proper range and all of the rest of the stamps, are authentic.
    Is there a known serial number range of rifles without the "U.S. Property" mark?

  9. #6
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    75
    Posts
    12,941
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:06 PM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12
    I'd love to see some quality close up pics of this piece ...

    It could make for a nice addition to the Savage Enfield Rifleicon articles in the MKLicon ....

    Regards,
    Badger

  10. #7
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:29 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    77
    Posts
    963
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:06 PM
    Considering how one would process the tooling operations for the receiver, I can see the markings would have required three stations along the assembly process.

    1. Markings on the receiver flat
    2. US Property mark on the receiver angled flat. This could not have been done at the same time as the receiver flat due to the angled receiver surface.
    3. Serial number on socket

    Given that the markings were a three part operation, i can see where the US marking might have been overlooked and later ignored if discovered. Like any volume series production line--manure happens. You don't want to know how sausage or automobiles are made.

  11. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to breakeyp For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Legacy Member SpikeDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    08-07-2020 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    257
    Real Name
    David
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:06 PM
    I've seen a couple of Savage rifles over the years missing the US PROPERTY marks that clearly had no signs of being scrubbed. I don't think there is any serial number range for it, just a random mishap. All Savage manufactured No.4's were produced under the lend lease act so with or without a US marking on it, it's still a lend lease rifle. If there is any truth to some of our soldiers being issued No.4's, I would think they were issued them in Europe, not having left the US with them but, that's just my opinion.
    David

  13. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to SpikeDD For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:06 PM
    Spike, being a bit pedantic, I think that the first Savage rifles were manufactured on a cash and carry basis so actually belonged to the UKicon. Only later did they become Lend Lease. It doesn't change the thread in any way of course. Or am I wrong here? Pre-Dec 41, cash and carry, paid for, up front, in gold. Post then, lend lease and they remained US property.

    As I said, I could be wrong but I recall the true story of the Catalina flying boats and the Diamond-T tank transporters (and half tracks) that we were using up until the early 70's

  15. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  16. #10
    Legacy Member SpikeDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    08-07-2020 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    257
    Real Name
    David
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:06 PM
    Thanks Peter, that certainly is a much more accurate account to the story of them I have heard and read about in the past. I remember now a discussion about them in years past with examples having been brought forth with mid production serial numbers, sort of clouding the early only suggestion. I would wager a guess to the early "cash and carry" examples being legitimate non US PROPERTY marked examples where as the later ones could certainly be as Mr. Breakey suggests... a random example of s**t happens.
    David

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Need Help to ID Lend Lease marks Rem Rand 1911A1
    By ridecontrol in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-16-2010, 10:53 AM
  2. lend lease garand
    By rice 123 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-16-2010, 10:56 PM
  3. Lend LEase '03's
    By Dan Shapiro in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-21-2009, 12:42 PM
  4. lend lease in combat
    By rice 123 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-06-2009, 02:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks