+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: # 7794XX safe to shoot?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mark W.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    05-16-2015 @ 09:36 AM
    Location
    Silverton Oregon
    Posts
    71
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:06 AM

    # 7794XX safe to shoot?

    Reading a Williams "How to Convert Military Rifles" Booklet it states that no M1903 made before 800,000 should be fired with any ammo reaching 50,000PSI due to the heat treatment of the receiver.

    I ask because mine has been used as a sporter for a very long time and I assume using factory ammo with no apparent problems.

    I like it is a WW I era rifle and would like to be able to shoot it even if with slightly reduced loads. While trying to restore it.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Deceased 45B20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    11-27-2011 @ 08:19 PM
    Posts
    88
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:06 AM
    Well, Williams is wrong (as are many people) on one count, the big problem with the Low Number Receivers was not the heat treatment,,, it was the FORGING.

    Hunk of steel heated, then forged into rough shape,,, then machined ,,, then heat treatment. Forging and heat treatment are not the same.

    Improper heat control (eye balled) during forging, allowed temp to get too high, resulting in ’burnt steel’, a lot like the cast steel of that time, not good. Not all receivers were over heated during forging, but you can’t tell which is which and reheating did no good , Springfield tried but it did not help. The heat treatment of the Low Numbers was entirely adequate and not in itself dangerous, the later double heat treatment and nickel steels gave a wider margin of safety.

    Heat treatment was done inside ovens and the receivers were not visible during the entire process.


    Now,, as to your question… That is a thorny one, many say never, no how, no way and some use light loads (cast bullets I hope), some use full power loads and shoot them anyway. I will not shoot a Low Number because of the possibility of a loss of an irreplaceable rifle. Now yours is ‘sporter’? does that mean it has been drilled and taped for scope/sights, and bolt turned down?? If it has not been messed with too much (no extra holes) and you can return it to original I would suggest not shooting it. If it has extra holes, shoot it if you want but do use extra eye protection and heavy gloves and do not let people stand around you when you shoot. Do have some one near that can render medical aid if needed. Very unlikely you will need it,, but who knows.

    Returning early M1903s to original can be very expensive, exceeding the monetary value of the rifle. But remember the rifle is yours, do what you want.

    45B20

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mark W.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    05-16-2015 @ 09:36 AM
    Location
    Silverton Oregon
    Posts
    71
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    Well Crap No mine has not been drilled nor the bolt messed with. To the best of my knowledge the only thing mine has had changed is the shortening of the stock at the lower band and the loss of the forestock metal parts.

    Always something wish I had known this before hand.

    Does anyone know what rockwell hardness the receiver should be I could easily have it checked.

  6. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    03-23-2024 @ 10:37 AM
    Location
    S.F.Bay area U.S.A.
    Posts
    157
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:06 AM
    Sorry, you should read this CMPicon warning concerning "Low number Springfields"

    M1903 and M1903A3 Rifles

    D.

  7. #5
    Deceased 45B20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    11-27-2011 @ 08:19 PM
    Posts
    88
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:06 AM
    Dad

    CMPicon is wrong in that the Double Heat Treat, did not correct the forging problem. Forging and heat treatment are two separate operations, done at different stages in the manufacturing process. To correct the forging problem Springfield installed more pyrometers and made the forgers use them.

    It does no good to apply any type of heat treatment, double or single, to a receiver that as a results of over heating during forging has ’burnt steel’. As I said, Springfield tried it and it did not help.

    CMP is certainly correct in the warning against the firing of Low Numbers. One of the arguments for shooting Low Numbers is that the ones with ’burnt steel’ have already failed, that is assuming they have been fired so many times that they would have failed by now. HOWEVER, how do you really know how many times a Low Number has been fired no mater how old it is. Shooting one is a crap shoot. It is the shooters choice.

    45B20

  8. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    03-23-2024 @ 10:37 AM
    Location
    S.F.Bay area U.S.A.
    Posts
    157
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:06 AM
    Hey 45B20,
    Yes I'm aware of the difference between forging and heat treatment. The control and monitoring of the heat to forge temperature is a vitally important quality control step in the manufacture of a forged part, since the integrity of the forging hangs on this operation being performed properly. The hot working (forging) operation is carried out in the austenitic temperature range for ferritic steels, where plastic deformation is performed above the recrystallization temperature. As the hot working (forging) temperature is increased, beyond the optimum range for the particular type of steel, severe crystal grain growth becomes a serious problem, affecting the mechanical properties of the finished forging. This condition is called "Overheating" and requires additional heat treatment steps to restore the desired mechanical properties of the forging. If the hot working temperature is increased further, grain boundary oxidation occurs. This condition is referred to as "Burning" and is irreversible. The mechanical properties of the steel forging are degraded, including ductility, tensile strength, yield strength and toughness. Forgings that are "Burned" during the heat to forge manufacturing process are only fit for the scrap heap. The fatigue strength of the steel is severely reduced too due to increased stress concentration sites, these are created by oxidized crystal grain boundaries at highly stressed surfaces.
    Heat treating a "Burned" forging will not reverse the degradation of mechanical properties.. Steel is heat treated to alter it's physical and mechanical properties. Heat treatment is performed by subjecting the steel (or steel forging) to controlled heating and cooling. Heat treatment of forgings plays an important role in developing desired properties such as increasing toughness, strength, relieve internal stresses, etc.

    The "Low Serial Number" S.A. and R.I.A. forgings were not subjected to close monitoring of the heat to forge temperature (eye balling color of forging was the norm!) and of course varied from operator to operator, time of day, season, etc. so some of the forgings were "Burned" and became brittle and subject to catastrophic failure if subjected to higher than normal forces or loads (sharp blows, cartridge failure, overloads, etc). The "High Serial Number" S.A. and R.I.A. forgings were subjected to close monitoring of the heat to forge temperature via Pyrometers and thus the material properties of the forged parts were not degraded.

    There is no non-destructive test that I know of that will separate the "Burned" forged parts from the properly manufactured ones.

    I gave the OP the link to the CMPicon to point out that the receiver was not the only suspect part, but the bolts of that vintage are also suspect.

    D.

  9. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mark W.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    05-16-2015 @ 09:36 AM
    Location
    Silverton Oregon
    Posts
    71
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    Having done a lot of reading this morning. I find that my rifle falls into the group that had the use of Pyrometers during heat treating and forging. right before the double heat treating was started at serial number 800K Reading Hatcher's Notebook pages on the subject it dose appear that there were for the most part extenal factors that contibuted to the rifles that failed. At any rate if the pyrometers were what actually corrected the problem then mine is in a safe zone. but not as strong as those with the improved heat treating that was done after 800K.

    From the page http://www.vishooter.net/sa_serialization.txt

    1917 Jan 1 - 632826 Front reinforcing bolt added April, 1917
    Buttplate checkering temporarily eliminated
    Pyrometers used in forging from Dec 1917 at SN 750001 to prevent burned metal
    1918 Jan 1 - 761758 DHT phased in by Feb 20, 1918 at SN 800000 (plus a little)
    Solid shank swivel replaces split shank swivel
    2850 yard volley notch eliminated
    Bent bolt Handle starts ~1000000
    Mark I production begins with SN 1034502
    Parkerizing phased in starting late 1918. Never used by armory on all parts.
    Trigger serrations temporarily eliminated



    Also knowing mine has been a sporter for at the very least 25 years (that is when the previous owner bought it) in the condition it is currently in. I have a hard time knowing the rifle went through it's original barrel (it currently has a 5-19 barrel on it) and then was rebuilt with a second barrel (or how ever many) And spent X amount of time as a Sporter deer hunting here in Oregon with a receiver that was about to shatter at any minute.

    Reading one of the pages from this site: U.S. Rifle Model of 1903 it states in Military records no failures were seen after 1929 and that many of the early failures were from external causes (8mm Mauser rounds, Dirt/mud on the battlefield, ****ty Brass and questionable rounds loaded during WWI, Nickle fouling as well as cosmolineicon coated bullets later after the war) All causing extreme chamber pressure exceeding what a Proof round would cause.



    Both my Barrel ( a class A steel rating) and Bolt have Proof marking on them My bolt is a 1904-1909 based on the "S" stamp on the bottom of the safety lug. It's a straight drop style with as I said a Proof mark on the underside of the bolt arm. Ithas a very smooth almost rounded shoulder but has not been reworked from what I can tell. . Though if this is a miss match to the reciever that could have taken place in a different receiver.

    The pick punch mark that should be on the receiver is not there. So I don't know if during the rebuild the whole assembly was PROOF fired.

    I'm not trying to argue with good advise given to insure my safety as well as anyone else's reading this forum, just trying to actually find out the truth.

    I will most likely try to find an original type stock for this rifle and the matching metal it's missing and once in a while take it out and shoot it a few times at the range.

    Hoping one day to trade it for an 03-A3 like I really want. Or if I find a nice 03-A3 I can afford maybe this becomes a true wall hanger
    Last edited by Mark W.; 11-17-2010 at 07:22 PM.

  10. #8
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-01-2023 @ 12:52 AM
    Posts
    2,508
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:06 AM
    At around 750,000 SA began enforcing Army regulations for '03 manufacture. AR's always required use of pyrometers in the forge house at SA. They were not used as the employees eyeballed the steel. They always over-heated the steel. Most of the low numbers were too hard and checking the hardness (Rockwell) doesn't prove a thing. They are too hard. So actually any '03 over 750,000 was properly manufactured. However, SA determined even these receivers could be made much safer by double heat treating the finished receiver. At around 775,000 double heat treatment was began, by 800,000 all receivers received a double heat treatment. This double heat treatment slowed down production and the obvious solution was to use nickel steel, as all M1917 receivers were nickel steel. But SA dug in its heels and refused to switch over to a modern steel. It is quite the interesting story, to say the least. A serial number of 779,xxx is most likely a safe rifle to shoot. Good luck.

  11. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mark W.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    05-16-2015 @ 09:36 AM
    Location
    Silverton Oregon
    Posts
    71
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    Well since I have a real nice Ruger M77R -06 and a very very nice M1icon Grand I doubt the Springfield will get much use. And since I do load for myself I will most likely come up with a moderate pressure load to use in it.

  12. #10
    Advisory Panel John Beard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:33 PM
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    1,062
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:06 AM
    Your reasoning is flawed.

    Springfield receivers were not forged, machined, heat treated, or assembled in anything remotely resembling a serial number sequence. And this is well documented.

    The descriptions and serial numbers cited in Hatcher's Notebook are misleading. A more accurate description would be to state that on February 20, 1918, Springfield Armory had approximately 25,000 serialized receivers awaiting heat treatment and those receivers were scattered over the serial range extending from S/N 750000 to S/N 800000.

    J.B.

  13. Thank You to John Beard For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Is it safe for me to shoot in my M1A?
    By colreed in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-08-2010, 02:00 PM
  2. CMP M1917 Eddystone Safe the Shoot?
    By cquickel in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-03-2010, 02:40 PM
  3. Safe or corrosive to shoot .30 Caliber?
    By davgil in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-24-2010, 10:33 PM
  4. Safe to shoot?
    By garandfan1974 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-15-2009, 09:46 PM
  5. Whats it worth and would it be safe to shoot?
    By PaleRider in forum Black Powder
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-12-2009, 06:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks