+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: 1917 LSA No I Mk III Aussie rifle?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Legacy Member Sht_LE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 01:48 AM
    Location
    Southern U.S.
    Posts
    94
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:22 AM
    June 1940 Lithgow barrel, cool. Don't quote me because I maybe wrong, but I think the Australiaicon stamp is an export or import stamp, as used in the 1950s but not entirely sure. I have a Australia inssued P.1907 bayonet (Wilkinson 1909 date) that has that same AUSTRAILIA stamp on the right grip.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    Legacy Member Anzac15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Location
    Suwanee, Ga.
    Posts
    1,491
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Myles, have seen only two other LE's with 'Australiaicon' like that. Both were straight up Lithgows.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #13
    Legacy Member Anzac15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Location
    Suwanee, Ga.
    Posts
    1,491
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Demo, there is not a date at the bottom of the forestock, and it certainly is unusual in that it retains the cutoff. This is an LSA receiver dated 1917, the war was at it's height, and little things like cutoffs had been pretty much done away with at this point. BUT (thats a big but..) I'm almost certain that I read that LSA did not build the NoI MkIII*, just stuck with the MkIII designation due to the fact that they built so few of them. Anyone heard this?
    This is what history is all about!

  6. #14
    Advisory Panel smellie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    01-14-2019 @ 09:17 AM
    Location
    Virden, Man. Pop 3250, 4 miles from Wolverine's range!
    Posts
    632
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:22 AM
    @ Paul S.: The entire Ross Rifle story, as with anything Canadian with an awful pile of money running through it, is political to such an extent that one really requires a gas-mask when investigating it. I'll overlook the ammunition issue here (Canadian ammunition did NOT jam in the Ross but it also worked much too well in Vickers MGs to be allowed to rest with the Dominion forces) and the fact that the 1910 rifle never had a comprehensive troop trial: it was too new, only entering series production in 1912.

    The Prime Minister of Canadaicon from July 11, 1896 through to October 6, 1911 was Sir Wilfrid Laurier, who was a Liberal. Ths would be, to an American, much like having a Democrat President with a Democrat House for 15 years. This includes the entire period of the Boer War AND the entire period of trials, experiments, adoption and production of the early Ross Rifles. It was under this government that the Standing Small Arms Committee made demand after demand after demand on Ross, resulting in the bewildering variety of alterations made to the rifle in production. It was also in this period that the Mark III (aka the Model of 1910) was developed, tested and adopted.

    Sir Robert Borden became Prime Minister on Laurier's leaving office and continued after the War. He was a Conservative. The American equivalent would be a Republican President with, of course, a Republican House, for our Prime Minister is the Leader of the majority party.

    Sir Sam Hughes, who was Canada's Minister of Militia and Defence from October 10, 1911 through to October 12, 1916 (total of 5 years and 2 days) was an Orangeman and a lifelong Conservative.

    About the only "cronyism" which can be charged would be that Sir Charles Ross (who designed and built rifles) and Sir Sam Hughes (who shot rifles) both were target-shooters although, to be entirely truthful, Hughes WAS most vocal in his praises and advocacy of the Ross Rifle. Politically, however, Hughes did not come into a position to do anything more than advocate until 10 years AFTER the initial adoption of the Ross.

    The Ross had troubles, yes. Most of these troubles would have come to light, been exposed and corrected had there been rifles and time for an adequate troop trial prior to the outbreak of the War. But Canada's professional Army was utterly tiny at that time: more than 90% of the Canadian Army was composed of Militia units, many of which atended a Summer Militia Concentration every 2 years. When it came time for the 1914 SMC, the world already was falling apart. The vast new Army being put together for the Great War did its basic marksmanship training with the old Mark II Ross Rifle (which is why so many of the surviving rifles in this country have shot-out bores: the 20,000 delivered to the US had decent barrels), after which they were handed brand-new Mark III rifles which were being built while they were training. These new, untested rifles, were the ones they took overseas.

    The problem is that the same, old, political tales and propaganda still are being repeated today. I talked with a number of Great War combat veterans who had actually USED the Ross in some of the worst fighting of any war, any time period, including the fabled Gas Attack at St. Julien on Apil 22/23, 1915. NOT ONE would say a thing AGAINST the Ross. The closest I got to a negative remark was a well-balanced and well-weighed statement from a decorated officer who was an experienced shooter prior to the War and who had worked his way up from Private to Captain. He said, "The Ross Rifle was unpopular due to its length and weight; you couldn't get into a dugout with your rifle slung. In our outfit we had NO troubles with the Ross Rifle, but then, we kept our equipment CLEAN, not like some regiments that never cleaned their equipment."

    The problem is that people read books on a topic...... and then write new books on the topic..... repeating the same old lies until they BECOME the accepted truths.

    And the Great War veterans are all gone, now, so it appears likely that the Ross Rifle will be damned eternally.

    BTW, the problems with the Ross Rifle were investigated thoroughly at that time and subsquently. You can find the relevant information in "The Ross Rifle Story" as well as in the 40-or-so-volume Official History of "The Canadian Expeditionary Force in the Great War". I believe the information regarding the jamming problem with certain ammunition was in an Appendix to Volume 38, but I don't have a set here to check against. This particular Appendix has been published recently as a pamphlet and is available at gun shows for about $15.

    I do hope this clears up some of the cronyism charge at least.
    .

  7. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to smellie For This Useful Post:


  8. #15
    Legacy Member Sht_LE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 01:48 AM
    Location
    Southern U.S.
    Posts
    94
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:22 AM
    I have also read that LSA stuck with the Mk.III and never made the Mk.III* without the cutoff. The rifles I have seen seem to confirm this. Anyone else have any more info on them? I do know that LSA made rifle are very hard to find in my area.
    I do own one LSA made rifle. It is a Mk.III (it is milled for the cutoff) that is 1917 dated. While it shows no Australianicon property stamps or FTR marks I would bet it saw Australian service and was worked on by an Australian armourer. It has a 1919 dated Lithgow buttstock on it and a "new" Lithgow bolt and bolthead fitted (serial numbered to the rifle). Almost everything else is LSA marked.

  9. #16
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    02-21-2024 @ 01:40 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    774
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    12:22 AM
    I recently picked up a 1918 LSA MkIII* (no cutoff slot) here's the thread i started.
    1918 LSA MkIII* 1915 Remington P'07 bayonet

  10. Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:


  11. #17
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    buffdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    12-02-2013 @ 11:01 AM
    Location
    Manitoba, Canada
    Posts
    191
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:22 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul S. View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've read multiple sources, Marching to Armagaddon for one, stating that the selection of the Ross Rifle was the result of crony-ism, politics and wheeling and dealing at the highest levels of Canadaicon's government of the day.

    "The Dominion was fed up playing the poor relation accepting Imperial Ordinance hand-me-downs. Furthermore, Sir Frederick Borden, Minister of Militia in the Laurier Government, had gone hat-in-hand to the Britishicon War Office to plead for rifles, and come away empty handed. (Note 1 ) Nor were the English gun makers, notably the Birmingham Small Arms Company, willing at the time to accept Sir Frederick's invitation to set up shop in Canada."

    The Ross Rifle Story

    Notes - Canada's participation in the Boer war drew heavily on the Nation's limited stock or rifles creating a dire shortage.

    Note 1 - Ralph Allen, "The Misfortunes of War," Macleans, June 3, 1961, P.42



    "Thought was given to adopting military rifles like the Mauser, Lebel, and Springfield, but it was decided that dependency on foreign gun makers would be imprudent."

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Given these circumstances, it is no wonder that the Government of Canada would attach a favorable attitude toward the Ross, or any other Canadian manufactured weapon.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Canadian ammunition was made to a higher standard and quality, and minimum dimensions. This was the specification for the Ross chamber. The British diverted the Canadian ammunition for their machine guns, as SMELLIE has stated, and issued the Canadians ammunition that had been CONDEMNED, particular Birmingham Metals Lots B14 and B15. This oversized ammunition in the tighter Ross chambers was a big factor in the "Ross Rifle Jamming."
    .
    .
    Last edited by buffdog; 06-09-2011 at 04:07 PM.

  12. #18
    Legacy Member Sht_LE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 01:48 AM
    Location
    Southern U.S.
    Posts
    94
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:22 AM
    Thanks 5thBatt! Solid confirmation that LSA did make Mk.III*s. That info is much appreciated (Darn.... Now I will have to try and track one of those down) Lovely rifle BTW, the bayonet ain't to shabby either.

  13. #19
    Legacy Member Sht_LE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 01:48 AM
    Location
    Southern U.S.
    Posts
    94
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:22 AM
    Got curious and did a bit of research, thought I would share what I had found. LSA continued to produce the SMLE Mk.III (no volley sights but milled for the cutoff) into 1918. Approximately 50,000 SMLE Mk.III*s were made by LSA in 1918. So far the only observed serial number prefix seen to date on a LSA Mk.III* is P (I noticed 5thBatt's does have a P prefix).

  14. #20
    Legacy Member Paul S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-08-2020 @ 06:58 PM
    Location
    Back and forth between Sydney and Southern California
    Posts
    1,594
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:22 AM
    Smellie and Buffdog,
    Tah Gents. Thanks for your insights.

    Being a "displaced" Aussie (an Aussie living in the U.S.) I'm quite familiar with parlimentary political wranglings. Our political parties and governments are similar.

    I also remember reading something about the bloke who was the Minister of Militia, Sam Hughes, was the one who pushed the Ross rifle. My understanding was that Hughes bullied it through, and that Laurier was all too happy to have the Ross factory producing rifles - and jobs, in his Quebec constituency.

    Military History is one of my little "passions" so things the "why" of some of it seeks its answer.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. My first rifle (1917 SMLE)
    By drummerboy in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-03-2011, 08:14 AM
  2. 1917 Lithgow range rifle
    By BushyFromOz in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-16-2011, 07:09 AM
  3. BSA 1917 No.l Mk 111* target rifle
    By whiterider in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 06:21 PM
  4. US Model of 1917 Launching rifle
    By Warren in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-23-2007, 12:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks