Was Fazackerly doing FTR's of No.1s in 1954

[newcastle]

I just got 22 conversion of a No.1 which has been done on a rifle which was FTR'd in 1954and the Engraving/Font used looks identical to the Faz font on their No.4 Mk 2s. Serial may have been redone too : now it is U5xx.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Thunderbox]

Isn't it a BSA refurb? These usually have "FTR 53/4" in a very similar pantograph engraving to that used by Fazakerley. Would have tought Fazakerley would have used "FTR(F)" as with the No4s?

Would be interesting to see some photos.

[newcastle]

I got from a guy who had it on gunbroker (overpriced) for about 6 months. So I got in contact with him to ask a couple of questions and when he gave up trying to sell I pounced. Maybe the pics are still hosted there. will check.

---------- Post added at 12:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 PM ----------


Here we go.

---------- Post added at 12:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:58 PM ----------



---------- Post added at 01:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 PM ----------

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=235051181

[Thunderbox]

The rifle looks like a standard BSA 1954 FTR, although I haven't seen any that were refurbed as .22.

I expect the Tippins sight has been added much later, so its possible that the .22 conversion is later as well - although the rearsight looks fairly orginal in those photos. Any clues in the proof marks? Is the barrel sleeved or solid? If its solid, does it have .303 and .22 proof?

[newcastle]

Haven't got the thing yet but you've answered my next question of "What the hell is that sight?" and posed my follow up - did they ever do .22 coversions when refurbing, for a special order or anythign? I'll check it out when I get it and advise. the seller said that the barrel was NOT sleeved though.

[Steve H. in N.Y.]

I think the additional rear sight is a Cooey.

[Rowdy]

I think the rear sight was a Canadian conversion of a Ross sight - quite a legitimate model military training rifle.

[Steve H. in N.Y.]

I think the rear sight was a Canadian conversion of a Ross sight - quite a legitimate model military training rifle.

Yes, and I'd bet one....no, two beers that it's marked HWC for Herbert W. Cooey up in Ontario.

[newcastle]

what, the rifle or the sight will be marked HWC?

[Steve H. in N.Y.]

The sight. Nice rifle, by the way.